IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 05 November 2014 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3081A923D for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 10:45:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IqEz3At4y9lc for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 10:45:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com (mail-pa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AABB71A923A for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 10:45:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id bj1so1313180pad.17 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 10:45:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KJ490r2XFOuE1lHywU05pcpNWh+UUrQKRpt4dOBnKRo=; b=ARp0n/CMe0opYsWoUncnx5QBYqn2yt/mRoFd92co+qDtxnsbnD7ws09ereLaqKnqjd lXTPFpDjk91MXuwxSLTRvfZkFk6U2T+T/INpypVqvxkdsGi745CQZuu2m2mn84JfIE57 ur2nYUzag6bsiKyoWMRZL2Q2Q3rcn01uN4QLljHddj964m0dacUVggzW4EjV58KZsruJ HhMFOLFlxoIeHIMC4TYNQxlfuDopGHopexxciIQvCta9DfUJZacWN/Vn7wX1FbToKMNO FfnBdGqjYYcn4f85cC2kXNWgZOGh7paVyVEQrW88iIbZKWyC83woTOjiYQynneKLDbJY vmOg==
X-Received: by 10.70.34.44 with SMTP id w12mr4166042pdi.151.1415213137893; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 10:45:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.23] (107.199.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.199.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dj1sm3887693pdb.10.2014.11.05.10.45.35 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Nov 2014 10:45:36 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <545A7053.8030800@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 07:45:39 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
References: <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNIEOJCNAA.rhill@hill-a.ch> <54594A50.4090305@meetinghouse.net> <20141105001731.GA30186@mx1.yitter.info> <54597BDB.7040305@meetinghouse.net> <9FDE1247-717D-487F-BC0E-E30FEA33536F@gmail.com> <545A5859.1060505@meetinghouse.net> <D07F9A64.1367AE%jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
In-Reply-To: <D07F9A64.1367AE%jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/aeHB5LnRexSnR2bxgxXjNhk3VqU
Cc: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 18:45:40 -0000

One small gloss on Jon's text:

On 06/11/2014 06:46, Peterson, Jon wrote:
...
> I think the IETF likes it this way, because sometimes the best ideas come
> from unexpected sources. But to Suzanne's point, consensus here is shaped
> by our shared understanding of our processes and to some degree our
> people. It is the consensus of this group that will, and should, represent
> the IETF's response to this questionnaire. 

And, in the context of the IETF, "consensus" means "rough consensus".
Not everybody has to agree.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2418#section-3.3

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email