IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introduction problem, etc.)

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Thu, 19 May 2022 12:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20098C15EB30 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 May 2022 05:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.754
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.754 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id anjG8jzJ2Th2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 May 2022 05:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id AFDDBC15EB21 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 May 2022 05:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 45556 invoked from network); 19 May 2022 12:32:34 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 19 May 2022 12:32:34 -0000
Message-ID: <7c3e5b73-9e7f-bb10-429a-5c13637e059a@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 21:37:25 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0
Subject: Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introduction problem, etc.)
Content-Language: en-US
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CAMm+LwhD8wHJ284z91X5XP-8f+9=Dx1Kd50=8-Pd3SX==W6ivw@mail.gmail.com> <20220514171447.23A3840334EA@ary.qy> <CAMm+LwivypwPG_mAc=3w=dY4w9rgvO8+qY=c3Et+Gkitdw8GMA@mail.gmail.com> <3a66b3f8-03c0-d6b4-51fc-df093d88524f@taugh.com> <CAMm+LwjddEN3zS76SCnNtRb1cvq3ofnDdy6YXP5-SqjEsf2-8Q@mail.gmail.com> <a18d7934-acc8-ec51-1671-fa2ed98285e9@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <A744D295-3C2D-46B9-AFD8-E3174115F15A@bluepopcorn.net> <CAMm+LwiEAfB7T-A6d0_RY0qbNXdw_U999=610n29z4+9OKj1qQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwiEAfB7T-A6d0_RY0qbNXdw_U999=610n29z4+9OKj1qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1PeL1aCAGvn3L32VgnpflrIEnNs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 12:37:39 -0000

Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> * We have portable telephone numbers, why don't we have portable email
> addresses?

Considering that for portable telephone numbers, the original
telcos provided the numbers get some amount of money to
forward calls, email addresses are mostly portable.

Almost all, if not all, the email providers are fine to forward
mails to some other addresses if the users are keep paying money
for them.

						Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email