Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introduction problem, etc.)

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Thu, 19 May 2022 06:39 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3016C14F688 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2022 23:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.752
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.752 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7tAK86Q6dyGR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2022 23:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC8BDC14EB1C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 May 2022 23:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E2F5C0182 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 May 2022 02:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 19 May 2022 02:39:12 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1652942352; x=1653028752; bh=W0fyYKpI1h5yVDBF1oHuJrwfrXdr T8C244tyslKwU2k=; b=qSdbgMeIdYiA+sjhKT1NBJJ3KHESx63xV0HsPdxOgOYR S2uPY3HuDDsIiAhV1hfoikWaXEJGBxYXjoeljGi6tM+H5eSsXl9TFC+ItL6EqqGJ tc3y0R4CIixL6gdAgtoEzcX/oT51mhE7lSrQ49v95obdmswgOpMz5GFcxp4oQ5Ap 8imuGRF2e7Cyyz7QvWsZvXa+PszDnfdOouYrLJ9Go6KeQNivgGgrsO0hXGZeUylH Cm8T9AcpPK/HIDJ2X+Yvje2p/lgadixUheVKoJFqckRBmZW4P7HlbGHDsD+qF+td O3TOSTXJzEJogSqOy4yUPiEVJ28qoNP1vWsTjLA5Xw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:D-aFYvDl_pzN8J8d5S39vJmQstRFsJauUIkLyNqX_onPpfCEi0WZzQ> <xme:D-aFYlijUzw7RzOAbhMEPvpcsIRBN39jRKq_PiU6VJaVf6D7JRW3epEi_CTJivahI km0Lf91LcLS2A>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:D-aFYqn03bDM7Q-lA80cbhLD9J01maIm8pGVkN6W-aq2AQl6lToR1l6tIbk0XP90vjhGyvnpHINsZ9PpxXTfqbYgxLrY-UV35ASSIanixyBXTFTHHoVUuw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedriedtgdduudduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpegtkfffgggfuffvfhfhjgesrgdtre ertdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihhthhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfiho rhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepheefuddvgefgfe evieeigfegledufeejudeiteeludegfeffleffveeiffekieffnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfu ihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkh dqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:D-aFYhxuABePJxRF3H3nJJHBLzQXjx8s58b4lgf0-y-jDjDBIIs6qQ> <xmx:D-aFYkTOLzTEAg5vOQuLFPDM8lHKUBu9frhpgsqhraoFuyiFV_kciA> <xmx:D-aFYkaHQssAvhlr9wbFKC3uAJjQMmSELZdOkt7g-FxOFC6dUuvp8g> <xmx:EOaFYrcerGUMyM0ygChjQmHJF6upyHPlmIhAm69ZRP-CgkMBLJWMZg>
Feedback-ID: i5d8c41f0:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 May 2022 02:39:11 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------jqxqSZcJOFYG1S5xX7PTWsUS"
Message-ID: <eb84efdc-34cb-80cd-c611-e86e099f6d92@network-heretics.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 02:39:10 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1
Subject: Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introduction problem, etc.)
Content-Language: en-US
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CAMm+LwhD8wHJ284z91X5XP-8f+9=Dx1Kd50=8-Pd3SX==W6ivw@mail.gmail.com> <20220514171447.23A3840334EA@ary.qy> <CAMm+LwivypwPG_mAc=3w=dY4w9rgvO8+qY=c3Et+Gkitdw8GMA@mail.gmail.com> <3a66b3f8-03c0-d6b4-51fc-df093d88524f@taugh.com> <CAMm+LwjddEN3zS76SCnNtRb1cvq3ofnDdy6YXP5-SqjEsf2-8Q@mail.gmail.com> <a18d7934-acc8-ec51-1671-fa2ed98285e9@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <A744D295-3C2D-46B9-AFD8-E3174115F15A@bluepopcorn.net> <CAMm+LwiEAfB7T-A6d0_RY0qbNXdw_U999=610n29z4+9OKj1qQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwiEAfB7T-A6d0_RY0qbNXdw_U999=610n29z4+9OKj1qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Tg8m-Y0ryD520Id7uK4HwjElHtc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 06:39:21 -0000

On 5/18/22 22:50, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> * We have portable telephone numbers, why don't we have portable email 
> addresses?

We do, it's just that most people don't use them.

But even though it's slightly cumbersome and a bit too expensive, anyone 
can get their own DNS name, point their MX records at a mail service 
provider of their choice, and change those MX records and migrate their 
stored mail to the new provider whenever they feel the need.  (They can 
of course also operate their own mail servers if they want, but that's 
quite a bit more involved.)

For me a more interesting question is: Why are there so few competent 
mail service providers?

(note that the cumbersomeness and expense of having one's own DNS name - 
which I readily acknowledge, aren't the biggest barriers to having 
portable email addresses.)

Of course another reason that most people don't have portable email 
addresses, might be that changing email addresses from time to time is a 
fairly common way to deal with spam.

Keith