Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the alternatives, was Service outages planned for April 25
Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Thu, 28 April 2022 22:29 UTC
Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2FAC1594B6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.755
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.755 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P-CZionyJOfZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 706FEC159481 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07DCE32009AD; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:29:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:29:25 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1651184964; x=1651271364; bh=Zu7gw9ka44BndOoscgpN40C0iZq3 jS+L2FE+AYPOH98=; b=UN2CSmIZAApOXMlQ1MloHfd5IzjFTGVW4Yc0tjB3lttn XAa7UBoMiAkFU1IsHjcOY1uWl14F7+U5+3kKt9zUnt2vnPhTNzJAOIuMkdbecJO7 8tBdvnS7QYhcQ1PosocRYXUR8+MRvtUEriWbB5D/zkLdG+O5Tidb8oH8NBaDjnUU U4K51picRqLCKrLlV/sW4GEyC/U3JerAROSOimz7yOoU7Jb5tx9rM+LtL44eAQ3h Nc3yRJz7AnyxrkhbPB8r50AFL4YKRzjttc4/JNFIizxzOYV3/auWa6EXQMNILGh1 MPZHYK1o1NH9e+dZAXQHdNbGDcClHnIVLsw2co6Jmg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:RBVrYnA7wgsUBuFd_7xCj4kqSWyUxBME5LPKoihm9foZlZ8829UJNw> <xme:RBVrYtgKULbbSffprxSkV0butLJMkGYLdM7ZrURlUUgQ68h6FWvuWS6VpsD9Elm7t i5L3exzNWjlXA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:RBVrYikGU9AbgMF9Au29D113Wsq9bEJGrrsNkNK6MwxOFbOegflEvRJwmQaBIGmJqjWOk_t781Sr4kW9ZDsmkLkVtCmmR6DoAOXFVA2jAUVuIK9Lt0df2A>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrudekgddtlecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefkffggfgfuvfhfhfgjtgfgsehtkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhh ucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeftddvleeijeevkeejhfeuudehveeihfejfedvgfduhfff hfduuddufeeggfetveenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:RBVrYpzhkctWAh3t33QNjibfxQiePRHSZvPfjd6Fkt06a-eSU-SU_w> <xmx:RBVrYsT74j05Av8Twfvrl2QFtM-NN-lC2HOeaiQCQV8_podq0rRUww> <xmx:RBVrYsbmbdmsyEQEAXrIXalILKeKF8o6Zeia-u9EdttsYFkUC3VYDg> <xmx:RBVrYrPACWBrwcxz5Z8Ws6yzyQnEZ7uHNbBrtG9TwMputP-vpVVvtw>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:29:24 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <e11aeebf-22f6-b067-db4f-ea84fe41abc5@network-heretics.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:29:23 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0
Subject: Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the alternatives, was Service outages planned for April 25
Content-Language: en-US
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <20220428221138.9BFD63F11488@ary.qy>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220428221138.9BFD63F11488@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/i3s9YWpvqLiQEKXYFnbAW_v1FAU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 22:29:36 -0000
On 4/28/22 18:11, John Levine wrote: > It appears that Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> said: >> Also, why should it be a dark art to have legitimate email successfully >> delivered? > Because spammers try very hard to make their mail look like legitimate > mail, and unlike you, they have a financial incentive to figure out > and evade the filters. > > It may not seem fair, but it's reality. I would like to be able to set > up my new nice mail server and send my nice mail without having to do > SPF and DKIM and DMARC and MTA-STS and TLSA and IP reputation and > while I am waiting I would also like a pony. It's generally been my experience that people say "it's reality" in the same way that people sometimes say "it is clear that..." ... i.e. when they can't actually justify what they're saying, or they don't have the imagination to see how things could be different, or maybe, when they have an interest in maintaining the status quo. It's a red flag, an anti-pattern. But you didn't actually answer my question. Because getting your mail delivered is not just a matter of doing SPF and DKIM etc., it's black magic. It's jumping through hoops that most people don't know exist, and the people who impose those hoops want to keep them somewhat secret... until they can impose more hoops. Which is great if you're in the hoop selling business I guess. It's a deplorable situation, and IETF shouldn't be propping it up. Keith
- Service outages planned for April 25 Robert Sparks
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Robert Sparks
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 tom petch
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Jay Daley
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Keith Moore
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Carsten Bormann
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Keith Moore
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Carsten Bormann
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Keith Moore
- Email and reputation (was Re: Service outages pla… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: Email and reputation (was Re: Service outages… Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … John Levine
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… John Levine
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … John R Levine
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… John R Levine
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Christian Huitema
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Masataka Ohta
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Masataka Ohta
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Michael Richardson
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… John Levine
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… John Levine
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Keith Moore
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Christopher Morrow
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Keith Moore
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… John Levine
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Keith Moore
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Christopher Morrow
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Keith Moore
- Deployment strategy for email+ Was: Mail is worse… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… John Levine
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… John R Levine
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Masataka Ohta
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Masataka Ohta
- Trying to do too much (was Re: the introduction p… Jim Fenton
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Keith Moore
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Keith Moore
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Michael Richardson
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Masataka Ohta
- Re: potable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (wa… John Levine
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: potable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (wa… Michael Richardson
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Keith Moore
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… John R Levine
- Re: potable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (wa… Keith Moore
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Masataka Ohta
- Re: potable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (wa… Masataka Ohta
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… Michael Richardson
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… John Levine
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… Michael Richardson
- We are not a mail forwarding service Carsten Bormann
- Re: We are not a mail forwarding service John R Levine
- ugly hacks (was: Re: We are not a mail forwarding… Keith Moore
- Re: ugly hacks (was: Re: We are not a mail forwar… John Levine
- Re: ugly hacks (was: Re: We are not a mail forwar… Keith Moore
- Re: We are not a mail forwarding service Robert Sparks
- Re: We are not a mail forwarding service Carsten Bormann
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: potable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (wa… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… Keith Moore
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… Phillip Hallam-Baker