Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the alternatives, was Service outages planned for April 25

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Thu, 28 April 2022 22:29 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2FAC1594B6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.755
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.755 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P-CZionyJOfZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 706FEC159481 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07DCE32009AD; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:29:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:29:25 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1651184964; x=1651271364; bh=Zu7gw9ka44BndOoscgpN40C0iZq3 jS+L2FE+AYPOH98=; b=UN2CSmIZAApOXMlQ1MloHfd5IzjFTGVW4Yc0tjB3lttn XAa7UBoMiAkFU1IsHjcOY1uWl14F7+U5+3kKt9zUnt2vnPhTNzJAOIuMkdbecJO7 8tBdvnS7QYhcQ1PosocRYXUR8+MRvtUEriWbB5D/zkLdG+O5Tidb8oH8NBaDjnUU U4K51picRqLCKrLlV/sW4GEyC/U3JerAROSOimz7yOoU7Jb5tx9rM+LtL44eAQ3h Nc3yRJz7AnyxrkhbPB8r50AFL4YKRzjttc4/JNFIizxzOYV3/auWa6EXQMNILGh1 MPZHYK1o1NH9e+dZAXQHdNbGDcClHnIVLsw2co6Jmg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:RBVrYnA7wgsUBuFd_7xCj4kqSWyUxBME5LPKoihm9foZlZ8829UJNw> <xme:RBVrYtgKULbbSffprxSkV0butLJMkGYLdM7ZrURlUUgQ68h6FWvuWS6VpsD9Elm7t i5L3exzNWjlXA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:RBVrYikGU9AbgMF9Au29D113Wsq9bEJGrrsNkNK6MwxOFbOegflEvRJwmQaBIGmJqjWOk_t781Sr4kW9ZDsmkLkVtCmmR6DoAOXFVA2jAUVuIK9Lt0df2A>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrudekgddtlecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefkffggfgfuvfhfhfgjtgfgsehtkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhh ucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeftddvleeijeevkeejhfeuudehveeihfejfedvgfduhfff hfduuddufeeggfetveenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:RBVrYpzhkctWAh3t33QNjibfxQiePRHSZvPfjd6Fkt06a-eSU-SU_w> <xmx:RBVrYsT74j05Av8Twfvrl2QFtM-NN-lC2HOeaiQCQV8_podq0rRUww> <xmx:RBVrYsbmbdmsyEQEAXrIXalILKeKF8o6Zeia-u9EdttsYFkUC3VYDg> <xmx:RBVrYrPACWBrwcxz5Z8Ws6yzyQnEZ7uHNbBrtG9TwMputP-vpVVvtw>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:29:24 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <e11aeebf-22f6-b067-db4f-ea84fe41abc5@network-heretics.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:29:23 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0
Subject: Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the alternatives, was Service outages planned for April 25
Content-Language: en-US
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <20220428221138.9BFD63F11488@ary.qy>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220428221138.9BFD63F11488@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/i3s9YWpvqLiQEKXYFnbAW_v1FAU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 22:29:36 -0000

On 4/28/22 18:11, John Levine wrote:

> It appears that Keith Moore  <moore@network-heretics.com> said:
>> Also, why should it be a dark art to have legitimate email successfully
>> delivered?
> Because spammers try very hard to make their mail look like legitimate
> mail, and unlike you, they have a financial incentive to figure out
> and evade the filters.
>
> It may not seem fair, but it's reality. I would like to be able to set
> up my new nice mail server and send my nice mail without having to do
> SPF and DKIM and DMARC and MTA-STS and TLSA and IP reputation and
> while I am waiting I would also like a pony.

It's generally been my experience that people say "it's reality" in the 
same way that people sometimes say "it is clear that..." ... i.e. when 
they can't actually justify what they're saying, or they don't have the 
imagination to see how things could be different, or maybe, when they 
have an interest in maintaining the status quo.  It's a red flag, an 
anti-pattern.

But you didn't actually answer my question.   Because getting your mail 
delivered is not just a matter of doing SPF and DKIM etc., it's black 
magic.   It's jumping through hoops that most people don't know exist, 
and the people who impose those hoops want to keep them somewhat 
secret... until they can impose more hoops.

Which is great if you're in the hoop selling business I guess.

It's a deplorable situation, and IETF shouldn't be propping it up.

Keith