Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, was Email

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 04 May 2022 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844D8C1594A7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2022 12:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.852
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=hyHkEGYa; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=H9+jOoMH
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VUe3fgOppWda for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2022 12:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFE48C159828 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 May 2022 12:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 46559 invoked from network); 4 May 2022 19:03:14 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=b5db.6272cdf2.k2205; bh=2GJPsGLW8A9DBjwa7SI7wcUpLXHXS3RbMkUc95Pu0Dc=; b=hyHkEGYaty1Qj+XpdSQEFdg1W/uS+ciTYKdOespN4Ypja7dO5rPrxXcbbMkTDCUG9jc3wZx1lPvcV4RNa4gnFCZ5clFaMLUkUfaUHVq2WQgw+92Flxj/0qUAGGstrYg2Z13FlPZUZ2DQYOoO0FoSjKtjAl9HUiiabhDpswJi4dUY7Egow1Y32wPEk9+tcQl5UnCIiM4JRqF1phZDx3fp7uC/n2/3MYUf8bgdojRLuLm+Mu8m/+uux+nxt+a2s/amqu35yvrc24euE+LsrcTUlxnpMl+yxjL7rDbZE0IrJdoUCwOgsjw//sY2PGzZCpHJHcYGIb6SJgFOnvLRyoiSSw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=b5db.6272cdf2.k2205; bh=2GJPsGLW8A9DBjwa7SI7wcUpLXHXS3RbMkUc95Pu0Dc=; b=H9+jOoMHulMKLFZa7F7P1liufvoxZVn38JvDw6uBJPzQSiDcnndDzbAYA7jqHYCZ/NuKmAFQwU/zUYVEQN0wqn1jceWqQgFTjmXxRskb7iMfJeybrGZpgaqmayvpw1kEtyLPaFdCy8CkzDJ6xqWebY62BYqGLJtansQTvvguWuQjuhsz3bNIdXmsgHJdsyAH0fsWu+H+gVBo36zeYwCMwG9TQXy9spfm2EAoFuwT/H/rOJlfWm9hF3r3mZuwEK32wgqrdWW4ffLzlLavEFTcp+sHnep8JUhUvlrC+IeKoLjSNiWyCCprWF7YVYJFNpxx8LOvTEiKq+e/iT8VaqwJbg==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 04 May 2022 19:03:14 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9F3D13F5F019; Wed, 4 May 2022 15:03:12 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 15:03:12 -0400
Message-Id: <20220504190313.9F3D13F5F019@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, was Email
In-Reply-To: <fbcf06d4-6d29-4330-6ba6-f5beeb2310e4@network-heretics.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/8R9SHd4_5vyTRgox_J7EEaYHZXE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 19:03:25 -0000

It appears that Keith Moore  <moore@network-heretics.com> said:
>> How much do we think 'transmitted in cleartext' exists anymore?
>TLS is still negotiated on a per-hop basis, and STARTTLS is subject to 
>downgrading attacks from well-placed intermediaries.

Only for domains that don't support MTA-STS or DANE TLSA. I think you
will find that the majority of mail operators, certainly by volume,
support at least one of them.

R's,
John