Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reputation (was Re: Service outages planned for April 25)

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Tue, 03 May 2022 13:07 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95908C157B39 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 06:07:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.755
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.755 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iRoAf64DGQNG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2022 06:07:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99151C159486 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 May 2022 06:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C5E3200A33 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 May 2022 09:07:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 03 May 2022 09:07:00 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1651583220; x=1651669620; bh=mVvQW8yXgd+Q/RDBBIApARPfZXSr fqJGorqY8Hd1XNw=; b=i8BXk1fM8dL25T72/pZvjYE5rmHwaqYpfp/pXikSI15P RTOdvm/TMo7117kAzC2q3xf6ZaHgkc+Nu9c4QSCy6J1U5Zx4ztEkMvZ9XP0Mr1Xp ds+9kKT8TiWbZNkKW2IRJpOOCTeLwGVj1GufyZkaydHrpxDIiASnczWYRCiDmFQ0 dRWPKjsUQxO9W1QCHHHDLrZBO4usj/Gj4kf1WQEdthYJIUpSB3WMVFyIOe52Tpjg JQSG7ukFMllDM8o7HHnUHrFS/hziljz6+mvRWnALO2ayQReRIBhux0DDizkGacMD r1884LMuHel8cNBCNdJirE5BHBZK3O4vlCRjB3tJJg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:9ChxYrjnXmkwRpc9LKmvUu7xnbgtimIsf72o7mIhWuEuxgW3mlNBDQ> <xme:9ChxYoAVLpfvhDT55h8_IVIILQZmQAcRomfNsZ8fWy5-XL2I5pL4rNXYqh1frRoZd gCrd6t4BVuHRg>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:9ChxYrF_UI959gbrRIEt8Dwvz_ygsyuRsTfjLJ7S0D7CcLAfCHzx6Qg9byKAkTgnMlM>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrvdejgdeitdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvfhfhjggtgfesthekre dttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihhthhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfiho rhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfedtvdelieejve ekjefhueduheeviefhjeefvdfgudfhfffhudduudefgefgteevnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfu ihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkh dqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:9ChxYoTQDtLpVP4IysBZGIJUq2wdgPZcAPtwChwnDk8hii6Z_GQQkA> <xmx:9ChxYowkma0wQdvpwSY7Dzs9bzv8mS0-uHXugOtEePIsxsfbK6YXYQ> <xmx:9ChxYu7zABuUD2Eh6QxTdkiHtc3z4EsxslPDYJWbAbw2EBbdOwleKQ> <xmx:9ChxYn-RD9nb5F55j0nmwXZtpZIKVqtqVoIpa6IXCVGQ8LkVnhK5pA>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 May 2022 09:06:59 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <a9ef127b-4ebe-168c-90df-ad9a60fbdeb6@network-heretics.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 09:06:29 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0
Subject: Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reputation (was Re: Service outages planned for April 25)
Content-Language: en-US
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <dcc27c29-51f8-c2a4-8ce4-ee1a3c6cb017@nostrum.com> <AAE3C51B-0150-483C-8244-3D60BC31B19A@tzi.org> <2c5df733-0f86-d319-b886-81882328caa9@network-heretics.com> <1870005490.14504.1651151102962@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com> <t4f3j1$1mpc$1@gal.iecc.com> <626060406.28268.1651487745123@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com> <2480fd36-c16a-6d98-ddac-15d02259ffbe@taugh.com> <837df6ce-a771-ff2f-515b-1021cc242c23@network-heretics.com> <2E576046-0532-41C8-AF51-1C2D09BC8BAE@dukhovni.org> <3ccd160a-8f1e-2a43-73b1-504d114b7c70@network-heretics.com> <YnEmUWCcyFMu56iE@straasha.imrryr.org>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <YnEmUWCcyFMu56iE@straasha.imrryr.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_slpjSODyJWbdIOz9KvHwowjjfA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 13:07:14 -0000

On 5/3/22 08:55, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:

> I am not claiming that solving the UX problems is profoundly difficult,
> indeed a number of design choices can make significant progress,*but*
> no MUA I know of presently offers anything remotely close.  More
> fundamentally, I don't see any likehood of substantial effort to improve
> extant MUAs.  For example, Apple keep chipping away at*removing*
> features from Mail.app:
>
> * one can no longer compose S/MIME messages, they can only be read
> * one can no longer subscribe to just a subset IMAP folders
> * ...

In general Apple keeps making their systems more dysfunctional over 
time, while at the same time making them more expensive.  I don't know 
how to fix that.

More broadly, it's hard to get energy to improve MUAs, even though 
there's plenty of room for improvement.   MUAs are still stuck in the 1990s.

Part of the problem, I think, is that email is a _standard_ rather than 
a _product_.   Nobody has an interest in promoting email for its own sake.
And people expect email (including the MUA) to be "free".

Also, people accustomed to one email UI, don't want to change to a 
different UI, no matter how bad their existing UI is.

Keith