Re: Service outages planned for April 25
Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Thu, 28 April 2022 11:39 UTC
Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F78FC1595E5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 04:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.752
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.752 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8NOrJU7pEwmj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 04:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 163B2C14F749 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 04:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32955C010D; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 07:39:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 28 Apr 2022 07:39:28 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1651145968; x= 1651232368; bh=6/eVAB5Y1WEmHDbRnqNblbgJMT7q4M8wPC41wj4K1LY=; b=y AA3oLUJRbOr3e1DYj/wwP/gJsuQHIsi/mXv7g6B5sOLjaXOybfsFy34lgMFgKFGH b8RAEQHZUa68JQuyQtpvzJ12vAZsrBxFUiizWNCB6wt2Qf01oiPo1X4Q/OL2/TQN heE52TeYLFcIMLaHnDjgqPbO7DhTc7vaHlvVkWsiXiHzK9FCyG1ICnPTDCobdPr+ egIexcdbguB84HS5RhEDNCQhZc+fy2t3zqp9/7FFKJIOgXgjiEes6J5gSQr160YB uPlaTwKZ4Kt8vy3HUkLZrSOYpsF5M7bgRdEmMFX4vFpnkM9EaaxXWeeBMvFb8MvB aKkxqJqxuUGmO+MwuXHjA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:8HxqYmdmMRGyZz2cnebNbuBJLxBFCg7bpb0DGmeGMVY8rxQCi8Ixdw> <xme:8HxqYgNA87SC-iRH2QD2syf0EMPBtoQkySA4h1UuGeHndN6Dz2Q-gHIcEPBDsEMZ7 I63ZE9P9dyp2Q>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:8HxqYnhLOSsasswfGyqI61f-EW34Ldf7-old4FQJ_G4EwZdZR1SGWrAwDxg9kfpCu3RgGMwixhKcK9KR32U5iWWhaQRQo3NMFRhPXEalcASx_q4uF9k_aw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrudejgdegvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjsegrtderredtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhh ucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtffdtvddvieefffeigffhtdduudetheeigeeviefggfeg vdekiefhheefudejteenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:8HxqYj9etshGpSY-ylGohaRg9VAu2v-zvuxmXqpoKHc76itxlNxeyw> <xmx:8HxqYit_qg4FO13Hyj2IvhloRaLP5wv8mbVbDtQx0-S4ZOADD-BFJw> <xmx:8HxqYqFjY3N01U6-Dbur2m8Z1vrAZOSdDx1dncphuTW7zsRZw7zYUQ> <xmx:8HxqYj5QUPWbcYUsHfH80onmFsISjnhV-bkFSMerN-EYbJ3WT3J3xQ>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 07:39:28 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------qDXXihfMCfdif8SGmpYYc0VS"
Message-ID: <2c5df733-0f86-d319-b886-81882328caa9@network-heretics.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 07:39:26 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0
Subject: Re: Service outages planned for April 25
Content-Language: en-US
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
References: <dcc27c29-51f8-c2a4-8ce4-ee1a3c6cb017@nostrum.com> <66aebf8b-2835-d572-ad00-eb2df514a157@nostrum.com> <626A610B.9050508@btconnect.com> <A449287A-CDA4-4173-8691-7049488FD130@ietf.org> <664edff3-3690-995f-1c1e-ce3e6c5c1eae@network-heretics.com> <44D37C5A-74E0-4C2E-AB5D-E0AA2F846331@tzi.org> <38f9687c-293d-e5db-7796-0de4939c64bf@network-heretics.com> <AAE3C51B-0150-483C-8244-3D60BC31B19A@tzi.org>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <AAE3C51B-0150-483C-8244-3D60BC31B19A@tzi.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/s__DW4vaZXxfqgt3S7Au9sm_2m0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 11:39:37 -0000
On 4/28/22 07:27, Carsten Bormann wrote: >> While large players can create problems, the problem is certainly not limited to one "large player". Why, for example, do "players" of any size feel the need to manually maintain lists of IP addresses of any color? > Because this appears to them to be a viable strategy for mitigating a fundamentally (outside FUSSP) unsolvable problem. Or because they don't have better tools. Or if better tools exist, they're not widely or uniformly used by senders. Also, why should it be a dark art to have legitimate email successfully delivered? >> And "failed to create an economic and regulatory environment" also sounds like presuming a solution that conveniently makes it "somebody else's problem" so that we have an excuse to ignore it. > Anticipating that (valid) criticism, I actually asked the question that actually would be relevant to us. > (As I said, this will not be solved onietf@ietf.org, so please don’t answer it here.) Another example of how IETF institutional culture promotes denial. Apparently we can't have discussions in the open; we must instead bury them so that the status quo will be perpetuated. We're supposed to be an engineering organization. Responsible engineers admit when there's a problem with their creations and look for ways to solve those problems, not ways to pass the buck. (Granted there are some things that are out of IETF's scope and it's important to keep IETF's scope in mind. ) Keith
- Service outages planned for April 25 Robert Sparks
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Robert Sparks
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 tom petch
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Jay Daley
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Keith Moore
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Carsten Bormann
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Keith Moore
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Carsten Bormann
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Keith Moore
- Email and reputation (was Re: Service outages pla… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: Email and reputation (was Re: Service outages… Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … John Levine
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… John Levine
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … John R Levine
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… John R Levine
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Christian Huitema
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Masataka Ohta
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Masataka Ohta
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Michael Richardson
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… John Levine
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… John Levine
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Keith Moore
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Christopher Morrow
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Keith Moore
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… John Levine
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Keith Moore
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Christopher Morrow
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Keith Moore
- Deployment strategy for email+ Was: Mail is worse… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… John Levine
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… John R Levine
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Masataka Ohta
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Masataka Ohta
- Trying to do too much (was Re: the introduction p… Jim Fenton
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Keith Moore
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Keith Moore
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Michael Richardson
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Masataka Ohta
- Re: potable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (wa… John Levine
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: potable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (wa… Michael Richardson
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Keith Moore
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… John R Levine
- Re: potable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (wa… Keith Moore
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Masataka Ohta
- Re: potable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (wa… Masataka Ohta
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… Michael Richardson
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… John Levine
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… Michael Richardson
- We are not a mail forwarding service Carsten Bormann
- Re: We are not a mail forwarding service John R Levine
- ugly hacks (was: Re: We are not a mail forwarding… Keith Moore
- Re: ugly hacks (was: Re: We are not a mail forwar… John Levine
- Re: ugly hacks (was: Re: We are not a mail forwar… Keith Moore
- Re: We are not a mail forwarding service Robert Sparks
- Re: We are not a mail forwarding service Carsten Bormann
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: potable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (wa… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… Keith Moore
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… Phillip Hallam-Baker