IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introduction problem, etc.)

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Fri, 20 May 2022 00:17 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A0CC237CEB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 May 2022 17:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.754
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.754 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mfh-mvIOdtC5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 May 2022 17:17:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0107C237CF9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 May 2022 17:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396525C0241 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 May 2022 20:17:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 19 May 2022 20:17:36 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1653005856; x=1653092256; bh=SLehbFApVrqcyvJc6wgEilAb7VyI 0dCgqBs0MG1UA6E=; b=AcW6M4/PJgxXqcTx3LPLbwuZHNmbOdLBRWflhL7ovQm2 CciJFc9Ur6UauPFNCWZ/m75A6s2v8ItmAqYKJZcO/8oD0odC1vDqXiH3qLRxNfgg peK1ElGMnF7s9dXH1AfPrvFu1hiTBtS3l7oL+HDQTiaW0Xn0ns4lf1IGI0sIODK8 FHJieqIzwoOOy/mMlh90WqTLJr/n6/bHkF9EtfW+WKhIHcWg+EIn6cAWpD7KrNBu ijlsOml6hHB384B346y+hylhmgi8NtbdgDmDq1ltTJh4okzbBNJYiWR1poHnjgSm brAOvaQZJubndpJqv5Adx9NHtyZ7LVLpnyWXtjqO6w==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:IN6GYiyi3akoOKQxfLRf8eop5EF_rKlmWnAR5GKN3RIuq-NZPXtJOg> <xme:IN6GYuSwl2N1RJbqnJB09kRnKA0y4CDYELXCQ6j9uxmMKLgqLKKoyXryqkQCCKJPX ZQ4vJANqEVIRw>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:IN6GYkWBE3ImItSGoIYruj93WAzOT1a9sRXGzHqSS1DnNqFMOWKgqADzqZpr3OkerzXN1S8KEsDqOnzGoq7tKHrwcQZqadu0W5BuzEMvsu8tclDSDrMPRw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedriedvgdefgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptgfkffggfgfuvfhfhfgjsegrtderre dtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhr khdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeehfeduvdeggfefve eiiefggeeludefjeduieetledugeefffelffevieffkeeiffenucevlhhushhtvghrufhi iigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqd hhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:IN6GYoh08V5fqpre2E5J7Q1t3gdsJph8_A6tVOmEQYHaE9TTrdSS6Q> <xmx:IN6GYkCSJPVlYsgniov8uvGVphaPby1sdRy7BmJexq5CHiTHjoiG7A> <xmx:IN6GYpJh3g-pkmnkhkL2cXPAHU7mudtqWTcLR5b4x2VGp1Gr0uhB3w> <xmx:IN6GYnOm993-OBegr4ELV8hsabY1rb1-Iod8FHedZVKKiWVu2hrtjA>
Feedback-ID: i5d8c41f0:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 May 2022 20:17:35 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------qxS0gL8GCbqW0nkY0nWYtsNX"
Message-ID: <9ed49378-5ea4-cb96-fe00-2a7b720dac15@network-heretics.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 20:17:35 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1
Subject: Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introduction problem, etc.)
Content-Language: en-US
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CAMm+LwhD8wHJ284z91X5XP-8f+9=Dx1Kd50=8-Pd3SX==W6ivw@mail.gmail.com> <20220514171447.23A3840334EA@ary.qy> <CAMm+LwivypwPG_mAc=3w=dY4w9rgvO8+qY=c3Et+Gkitdw8GMA@mail.gmail.com> <3a66b3f8-03c0-d6b4-51fc-df093d88524f@taugh.com> <CAMm+LwjddEN3zS76SCnNtRb1cvq3ofnDdy6YXP5-SqjEsf2-8Q@mail.gmail.com> <a18d7934-acc8-ec51-1671-fa2ed98285e9@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <A744D295-3C2D-46B9-AFD8-E3174115F15A@bluepopcorn.net> <CAMm+LwiEAfB7T-A6d0_RY0qbNXdw_U999=610n29z4+9OKj1qQ@mail.gmail.com> <eb84efdc-34cb-80cd-c611-e86e099f6d92@network-heretics.com> <711190.1652960694@dooku> <CAMm+LwgWPvPd6oQs8b1Pv_dsY8L5t=qAi-5LwTYF_mtte4zyKg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwgWPvPd6oQs8b1Pv_dsY8L5t=qAi-5LwTYF_mtte4zyKg@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/HjXdriAC5nws5wbDRBxnvsOZXf0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 00:17:45 -0000

On 5/19/22 19:05, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> I can provide an address for life for $0.10.

I believe you.  But as I pointed out earlier, the cost of the DNS name 
is the least of the reasons why most email addresses aren't portable in 
practice.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email