Re: Service outages planned for April 25
Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org> Thu, 28 April 2022 10:22 UTC
Return-Path: <exec-director@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBCE1C1595E6; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 03:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xqLaFbjPXHy5; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 03:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfx.amsl.com (unknown [50.223.129.196]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DAFDC159522; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 03:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfx.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83BBA41B18F3; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 03:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from ietfx.amsl.com ([50.223.129.196]) by localhost (ietfx.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dI4LRxNBGzZb; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 03:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [85.210.200.70]) by ietfx.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91AA541B18EF; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 03:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <A449287A-CDA4-4173-8691-7049488FD130@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E9D0F995-D171-4A04-9480-89796454A05A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.80.82.1.1\))
Subject: Re: Service outages planned for April 25
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 11:22:13 +0100
In-Reply-To: <626A610B.9050508@btconnect.com>
Cc: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, Working Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, irsg@ietf.org
To: tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>
References: <dcc27c29-51f8-c2a4-8ce4-ee1a3c6cb017@nostrum.com> <66aebf8b-2835-d572-ad00-eb2df514a157@nostrum.com> <626A610B.9050508@btconnect.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.80.82.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/mHCyYUmRPYni3Azgs_SkHIolXxs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 10:22:22 -0000
> On 28 Apr 2022, at 10:40, tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com> wrote: > > On 25/04/2022 17:48, Robert Sparks wrote: >> This transition is complete. If you see anything that looks like it >> shouldn't, please let me know. > > Well, the almost total absence of all mail - WG, announce, ietf.org <http://ietf.org/> etc - from the IETF in the course of 27th April. I have now, 28th April, received a lot of IETF mail dated 26th April so clearly there was a hiccup. I had assumed, as I posted to a list, a DoS attack and I even assumed that I knew which evil actor was at work - but I was wrong. One of the changes made in this transition was to the IP address range of our mail servers. As the IETF is a very high volume mail sender our address ranges often need whitelisting or other special treatment by large mail receivers. Having that special treatment restored with one large receiver took a couple of days (and much thanks to the IETF’r who helped with that). Jay > > Tom Petch > > > >> >> RjS >> >> On 4/12/22 4:46 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: >>> All - >>> >>> We are transitioning most of our service onto faster hardware with a >>> better network connection. >>> >>> This is currently planned for approximately 1500-1900 UTC on April 25 >>> (0800-1200 US Pacific). >>> >>> This will affect ietf.org email (including list processing and archive >>> access), www.ietf.org, www.irtf.org, and the datatracker. >>> >>> Email sent to ietf.org addresses during this time will queue, and will >>> be delivered after the transition is complete. >>> >>> We are working to minimize the downtime of any individual service. >>> >>> This transition includes steps towards not having to have transitions >>> that affect all services like this going forward. >>> >>> Apologies in advance for the inconvenience, >>> >>> RjS >>> >>> Please note that Reply-To is set to tools-discuss@ietf.org >>> >>> A version of this announcement is in process for ietf-announce. >>> >> >> . -- Jay Daley IETF Executive Director exec-director@ietf.org
- Service outages planned for April 25 Robert Sparks
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Robert Sparks
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 tom petch
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Jay Daley
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Keith Moore
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Carsten Bormann
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Keith Moore
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Carsten Bormann
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Keith Moore
- Email and reputation (was Re: Service outages pla… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: Email and reputation (was Re: Service outages… Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … John Levine
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… John Levine
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … John R Levine
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… John R Levine
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Christian Huitema
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Masataka Ohta
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Masataka Ohta
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Michael Richardson
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… John Levine
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… John Levine
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Keith Moore
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Christopher Morrow
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Keith Moore
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… John Levine
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Keith Moore
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Christopher Morrow
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Keith Moore
- Deployment strategy for email+ Was: Mail is worse… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… John Levine
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… John R Levine
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Masataka Ohta
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Masataka Ohta
- Trying to do too much (was Re: the introduction p… Jim Fenton
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Keith Moore
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Keith Moore
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Michael Richardson
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Masataka Ohta
- Re: potable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (wa… John Levine
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: potable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (wa… Michael Richardson
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Keith Moore
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… John R Levine
- Re: potable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (wa… Keith Moore
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Masataka Ohta
- Re: potable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (wa… Masataka Ohta
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… Michael Richardson
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… John Levine
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… Michael Richardson
- We are not a mail forwarding service Carsten Bormann
- Re: We are not a mail forwarding service John R Levine
- ugly hacks (was: Re: We are not a mail forwarding… Keith Moore
- Re: ugly hacks (was: Re: We are not a mail forwar… John Levine
- Re: ugly hacks (was: Re: We are not a mail forwar… Keith Moore
- Re: We are not a mail forwarding service Robert Sparks
- Re: We are not a mail forwarding service Carsten Bormann
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: potable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (wa… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… Keith Moore
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… Phillip Hallam-Baker