Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introduction problem, etc.)
Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Thu, 19 May 2022 23:00 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E80BC1D5AAF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 May 2022 16:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.403
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.403 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YrppP83do3BV for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 May 2022 16:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-f178.google.com (mail-yw1-f178.google.com [209.85.128.178]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23E53C185B12 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 May 2022 16:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-f178.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-2ff7b90e635so5501767b3.5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 May 2022 16:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WY1881ndM1M9tAQZULHg9wX5P9DO3IwoSUIQN+WTNrk=; b=lKtoJLhHOYzwHDqnHMHsDxHNtHHU66WpswNjRYt8DDDNhPvPFWaNYOidE+b/qwO09J aQf51kNm9wWm2btzNF6Nn/nntk9RW/oFYmZRLu+T+2s3Fmz3QB6inUBp9Z6LViW939iM jfVqRZEMQwt3J2L7tS9qufhm12WpwGkr5CB7/OtWvt4+co+agjP7xLJgiI25z+BPTCcQ MivFt7n2f8nPsHjXHpAio7ZabY9KXp48rjVn0jXxaseqhux/SwIlJ93lI2VrPd46iVU0 aiAuxBBHbtLQJ30xbvoUCGhvGZfKNGLtZUPzeUBdcKwyGeYEORkj87/YYEMGnM8/epud doAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hRITyaVGO17FLG8n0aT1Z+fey0xC/5qNa/zmeD70GGUlfIFNw EiURn4GUIuKKY/K1yFlFWR7ynqUtfLDpBfd0FdoGzBVI
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwxaQkr4WGQhH4NibLJ1Da6f71WzAAXGEGNhad7uAMHJtQoQ6datbCR3dmB1dYJIwc+unlS7urWqk6nCTJw3PU=
X-Received: by 2002:a81:1f84:0:b0:2f8:6138:de59 with SMTP id f126-20020a811f84000000b002f86138de59mr7260206ywf.31.1653001254114; Thu, 19 May 2022 16:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMm+LwhD8wHJ284z91X5XP-8f+9=Dx1Kd50=8-Pd3SX==W6ivw@mail.gmail.com> <20220514171447.23A3840334EA@ary.qy> <CAMm+LwivypwPG_mAc=3w=dY4w9rgvO8+qY=c3Et+Gkitdw8GMA@mail.gmail.com> <3a66b3f8-03c0-d6b4-51fc-df093d88524f@taugh.com> <CAMm+LwjddEN3zS76SCnNtRb1cvq3ofnDdy6YXP5-SqjEsf2-8Q@mail.gmail.com> <a18d7934-acc8-ec51-1671-fa2ed98285e9@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <A744D295-3C2D-46B9-AFD8-E3174115F15A@bluepopcorn.net> <CAMm+LwiEAfB7T-A6d0_RY0qbNXdw_U999=610n29z4+9OKj1qQ@mail.gmail.com> <7c3e5b73-9e7f-bb10-429a-5c13637e059a@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <7c3e5b73-9e7f-bb10-429a-5c13637e059a@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 19:00:43 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwhApM+_Y=S=jue7xK9uUBnrUfZEsW_JV-C0eUqts-6ZiA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introduction problem, etc.)
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009099bb05df6558d2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ZWUYDknSDNj-G8KkFoDEd1ly3fY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 23:00:55 -0000
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 8:38 AM Masataka Ohta < mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote: > Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > > > * We have portable telephone numbers, why don't we have portable email > > addresses? > > Considering that for portable telephone numbers, the original > telcos provided the numbers get some amount of money to > forward calls, email addresses are mostly portable. > > Almost all, if not all, the email providers are fine to forward > mails to some other addresses if the users are keep paying money > for them. > That is not how SS7 works.
- Service outages planned for April 25 Robert Sparks
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Robert Sparks
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 tom petch
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Jay Daley
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Keith Moore
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Carsten Bormann
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Keith Moore
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Carsten Bormann
- Re: Service outages planned for April 25 Keith Moore
- Email and reputation (was Re: Service outages pla… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: Email and reputation (was Re: Service outages… Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … John Levine
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… John Levine
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … John R Levine
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the … Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… John R Levine
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Christian Huitema
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Masataka Ohta
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Masataka Ohta
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Michael Richardson
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… John Levine
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… John Levine
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Keith Moore
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Christopher Morrow
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Keith Moore
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… John Levine
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Keith Moore
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Christopher Morrow
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Keith Moore
- Deployment strategy for email+ Was: Mail is worse… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: mail crypto, was the introduction problem, wa… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… John Levine
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Keith Moore
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… John R Levine
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Masataka Ohta
- Re: the introduction problem, was Email and reput… Masataka Ohta
- Trying to do too much (was Re: the introduction p… Jim Fenton
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Keith Moore
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Keith Moore
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Michael Richardson
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Masataka Ohta
- Re: potable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (wa… John Levine
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: potable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (wa… Michael Richardson
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Keith Moore
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… John R Levine
- Re: potable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (wa… Keith Moore
- Re: Trying to do too much (was Re: the introducti… Masataka Ohta
- Re: potable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (wa… Masataka Ohta
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… Michael Richardson
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… John Levine
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… Michael Richardson
- We are not a mail forwarding service Carsten Bormann
- Re: We are not a mail forwarding service John R Levine
- ugly hacks (was: Re: We are not a mail forwarding… Keith Moore
- Re: ugly hacks (was: Re: We are not a mail forwar… John Levine
- Re: ugly hacks (was: Re: We are not a mail forwar… Keith Moore
- Re: We are not a mail forwarding service Robert Sparks
- Re: We are not a mail forwarding service Carsten Bormann
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: potable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (wa… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… Keith Moore
- Re: portable e-mail, now Trying to do too much (w… Phillip Hallam-Baker