Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the alternatives, was Service outages planned for April 25

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Sat, 30 April 2022 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA01C15EB29 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 10:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JZ3sX06w4roS for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 10:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from straasha.imrryr.org (straasha.imrryr.org [100.2.39.101]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A988C15E6E3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 10:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by straasha.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 333DFF23D9; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 13:33:58 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 13:33:58 -0400
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Mail is worse than everything except all the alternatives, was Service outages planned for April 25
Message-ID: <Ym1zBpeclqZtM+Zm@straasha.imrryr.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20220428221138.9BFD63F11488@ary.qy> <e11aeebf-22f6-b067-db4f-ea84fe41abc5@network-heretics.com> <CAMm+Lwj7ZZn_enfkfMgLiSRaQbyEi6pBwoEdkdppA-=eOt8RRQ@mail.gmail.com> <f2856072-7c03-cf1f-9ee4-f48d84290f6c@taugh.com> <9095a004-c574-87d3-68d6-38e2b33f35f8@network-heretics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9095a004-c574-87d3-68d6-38e2b33f35f8@network-heretics.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/YbSevTDijx6Pu8HJXgB9XW4E0FE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 17:34:00 -0000

On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 11:56:37AM -0400, Keith Moore wrote:

> And in addition to the other reasons that cause people to prefer other
> media, spam filters have made cross-domain email notoriously
> unreliable.
> 
> We've basically lost what used to be a common Internet-wide medium for 
> effective communication, and that's an immense tragedy.

This is, at least from my perspective, rather an exaggeration of the
scope of problems.  Even though I am not even bothering with DKIM or
DMARC, or otherwise jumping through any hoops, I am not encountering any
issues with email delivery.

I still find myself from time to time taking advantage of searches
through my mailbox for decade+ year old messages, something that is
simply not viable for SMS, Skype, Signal, ...  Email is the only digital
medium where one can expect to be able to retain long-term
correspondence, and the sky is not falling, at least from where I sit.

Yes, there is a myriad of new options, and I also use some of them now
and then.

-- 
    Viktor.