IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv4 Outage Planned for IETF 71 Plenary

Martin Stiemerling <stiemerling@netlab.nec.de> Thu, 20 December 2007 08:59 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J5HFZ-0004N1-Su; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 03:59:29 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J5HFX-0004Mu-HC for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 03:59:27 -0500
Received: from smtp0.netlab.nec.de ([195.37.70.40]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J5HFW-0004M0-Sa for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 03:59:27 -0500
Received: from localhost (atlas1.office [127.0.0.1]) by smtp0.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA62C28000354; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:59:25 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (atlas1.office)
Received: from smtp0.netlab.nec.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas1.office [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r5JAs7N1UECQ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:59:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mx1.office (mx1.office [10.1.1.23]) by smtp0.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C610028000303; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:59:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.1.1.109] ([10.1.1.109]) by mx1.office over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:59:10 +0100
In-Reply-To: <082801c84281$adab2cb0$09018610$@net>
References: <E1J3IFS-0002yV-CG@ietf.org> <200712142154.lBELs1ne090300@drugs.dv.isc.org> <200712181644.lBIGisBx090029@romeo.rtfm.com> <476800BC.5030504@dcrocker.net> <38033976C354EAB237181075@[192.168.101.1]><p06250103c38dc78214d8@[74.134.5.163]> <080c01c84276$ec9a79e0$c5cf6da0$@net> <A9C8C359-F790-4882-AD5B-DD3D554221BD@cisco.com> <082801c84281$adab2cb0$09018610$@net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753)
Message-Id: <2BF31243-96AC-4FA5-B574-A0F6D215B38A@netlab.nec.de>
From: Martin Stiemerling <stiemerling@netlab.nec.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:59:09 +0100
To: alh-ietf@tndh.net
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Dec 2007 08:59:10.0712 (UTC) FILETIME=[9608A780:01C842E6]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2beba50d0fcdeee5f091c59f204d4365
Cc: 'Cullen Jennings' <fluffy@cisco.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IPv4 Outage Planned for IETF 71 Plenary
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2077568015=="
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Am 19.12.2007 um 21:56 schrieb Tony Hain:

>
>> Suggestions of WGs?
>
> mipv4
> mipshop
> netconf (should be high level, but ID examples are all IPV4)
> nea (should be agnostic, but clearly has the IPv4 mindset of a single
> address/interface)
> syslog (should be high level, but ID examples are all IPV4)
> behave
> midcom
> nsis (because most of the group is focused on nat signaling)

Nah, 80% wrong. Better go there and read again, as the group is not  
focussed on NAT signalling. NAT signalling is a part of some work there.

   Martin

>
> there are probably more, but closing these would be a good start  
> and set an
> example
>
> Tony
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

stiemerling@netlab.nec.de

NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division

NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road,  
London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email