IETF Logo Mail Archive

eating our own dogfood...Re: IPv4 Outage

Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU> Tue, 18 December 2007 20:38 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4jCh-0005w1-DU; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:38:15 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4jCf-0005tn-1P; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:38:13 -0500
Received: from boreas.isi.edu ([128.9.160.161]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4jCe-0005On-Cy; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:38:13 -0500
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lBIKaMT5004761 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:36:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from bmanning@localhost) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id lBIKaHDX004724; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:36:17 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:36:17 -0800
From: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <20071218203617.GA2167@boreas.isi.edu>
References: <E1J3IFS-0002yV-CG@ietf.org> <200712142154.lBELs1ne090300@drugs.dv.isc.org> <200712181644.lBIGisBx090029@romeo.rtfm.com> <476800BC.5030504@dcrocker.net> <38033976C354EAB237181075@[192.168.101.1]> <20071218194310.GW7070@thunk.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071218194310.GW7070@thunk.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: bmanning@boreas.isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, iaoc@ietf.org, dcrocker@bbiw.net, iesg@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: eating our own dogfood...Re: IPv4 Outage
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 02:43:10PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 01:32:00PM -0500, John C Klensin wrote:
> 
> Yes, right now IPv6 deployment isn't good enough that we can't do this
> without using all sorts of workarounds.  OK, let's document those
> workarounds and make them available to the attendees.  If it means
> that the IETF network provider has to hijack the root, then let them
> hijack the root on the IETF network, and document that fact.  If there
> needs to be NAT-PT bridges to allow IETF'res to get back to their home
> networks connected to ISP's that don't yet offer IPv6 connectivty,
> then let there be NAT-PT bridges --- and document them.  If various
> Windows, Macintosh, and Linux laptops need special configuration so to
> work around other problems, then document what the workarounds should
> be, and give people early warning and access to them.
> 
> 						- Ted

	as offical spokesmodel for the IETF in your role 
	as Sgt at Arms, your you SURE you want to advocate
	the IETF abandon its published statement wrt there 
	being ONE ROOT ...


--bill
Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email