Re: A sad farewell

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Thu, 05 November 2020 23:55 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1B23A08AB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 15:55:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.045
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.045 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Yn6fAetiR_J for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 15:55:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 376403A00C9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 15:55:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CS0lb03DGz1nwfY; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 15:55:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1604620555; bh=GjrfiTMqeK5xgzCfpjBEVe1zq8Cc1ZTMZOOXUn7XMhA=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=B2HgWpqltF8IYaDemTSfWCrdONHQGU4JRLxl+IeVKtVdn+uMsgmlNSFxMkCKdQwMq VOtLN0RLIZz+vcVgL3PvwA7N1kiAgGt4NcuBKnOzpgPO1aTPfSJorzy2pXBddEfXKl fZeMUC0AkodcuY5uEWHf9g14W6OcFlgmaBnjELIQ=
X-Quarantine-ID: <ppK4q-oCv4r2>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.128.43] (unknown [50.225.209.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CS0lZ2WhLz1nvSk; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 15:55:54 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: A sad farewell
To: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>, Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <174AC0A1-77B5-4B6B-AD9D-7C9FB6023BC1@episteme.net> <CEBA34FB-DBBB-4C8B-845B-4DA0DEE07E44@strayalpha.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <95e7e856-64b3-9c77-0b3c-8617dda43013@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 18:55:52 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CEBA34FB-DBBB-4C8B-845B-4DA0DEE07E44@strayalpha.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/TBAoiLGJ_b_69jmuZwEN9z3V3dc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 23:55:57 -0000

Joe, I think you missed an important part of Pete's message.

Even if we use other tools, we will need cusotmization to match our 
process requirements.  No, it does not have to work exactly like tools. 
and datatracker. work.  We have done a lot there to make AD and chair 
jobs tractable.  Someone will have to figure out how to do that for any 
other tool we start to use.  It is not even obvious that it can be done. 
  And it is certainly not obvious that it would be easy.

Yours,
Joel

On 11/5/2020 6:48 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Nov 5, 2020, at 3:37 PM, Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net> wrote:
>>
>> If you're simply saying we should adjust our workflow to conform to some other tool,
> 
> Everyone else does. Look at what Jira and github are used for.
> 
> The world has moved on. IMO, unless you (or others who want the alternate too) are volunteering to build tools - at the direction of others, and probably for insufficient funds or for free - there is no other path forward.
> 
> Joe
>