Re: and... text for the win
Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> Sat, 07 November 2020 07:14 UTC
Return-Path: <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460653A0AB0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 23:14:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kbxL8rgdLLut for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 23:14:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx36-out10.antispamcloud.com (mx36-out10.antispamcloud.com [209.126.121.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E0CF3A03EF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 23:14:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xse82.mail2web.com ([66.113.196.82] helo=xse.mail2web.com) by mx169.antispamcloud.com with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1kbIQA-000pQm-Nm for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2020 08:14:04 +0100
Received: from xsmtp22.mail2web.com (unknown [10.100.68.61]) by xse.mail2web.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CSpMs630NzXZh for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 23:11:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.5.2.18] (helo=xmail08.myhosting.com) by xsmtp22.mail2web.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1kbINt-0000ke-OE for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 23:11:37 -0800
Received: (qmail 1111 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2020 07:18:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.103]) (Authenticated-user:_huitema@huitema.net@[172.58.43.16]) (envelope-sender <huitema@huitema.net>) by xmail08.myhosting.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA for <ietf@ietf.org>; 7 Nov 2020 07:18:52 -0000
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <20201107023657.6E26825C2632@ary.qy> <7084383A-2ED7-4802-AFFE-1C9BBD578325@tzi.org>
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Autocrypt: addr=huitema@huitema.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEXtavGxYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdA1ou9A5MHTP9N3jfsWzlDZ+jPnQkusmc7sfLmWVz1Rmu0 J0NocmlzdGlhbiBIdWl0ZW1hIDxodWl0ZW1hQGh1aXRlbWEubmV0PoiWBBMWCAA+FiEEw3G4 Nwi4QEpAAXUUELAmqKBYtJQFAl7WrxsCGwMFCQlmAYAFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgEC F4AACgkQELAmqKBYtJQbMwD/ebj/qnSbthC/5kD5DxZ/Ip0CGJw5QBz/+fJp3R8iAlsBAMjK r2tmyWyJz0CUkVG24WaR5EAJDvgwDv8h22U6QVkAuDgEXtavGxIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEHQJoM 6MUAIqpoqdCIiACiEynZf7nlJg2Eu0pXIhbUGONdAwEIB4h+BBgWCAAmFiEEw3G4Nwi4QEpA AXUUELAmqKBYtJQFAl7WrxsCGwwFCQlmAYAACgkQELAmqKBYtJRm2wD7BzeK5gEXSmBcBf0j BYdSaJcXNzx4yPLbP4GnUMAyl2cBAJzcsR4RkwO4dCRqM9CHpVJCwHtbUDJaa55//E0kp+gH
Subject: Re: and... text for the win
Message-ID: <a6c9c156-f6d5-8150-8a49-f3695088b32f@huitema.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 23:11:36 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7084383A-2ED7-4802-AFFE-1C9BBD578325@tzi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------B2F63D733C06B168D86C75DF"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Originating-IP: 66.113.196.82
X-Spampanel-Domain: xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-Spampanel-Username: 66.113.196.82/32
Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=66.113.196.82/32@xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Class: unsure
X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.15)
X-Recommended-Action: accept
X-Filter-ID: Mvzo4OR0dZXEDF/gcnlw0XvADx2zSFwG+3csxFBPBHmpSDasLI4SayDByyq9LIhVUZbR67CQ7/vm /hHDJU4RXkTNWdUk1Ol2OGx3IfrIJKywOmJyM1qr8uRnWBrbSAGDAzc5Jb/eaE0k3pqeq35lKbgN zB/4Jkrw1eDLcif59fsDkxS8YLcw20dC3xH7qQ5lU7Tmz6iKnkQL9gqsxD347235Nhqq+/HvroPq 8GSPg+60/QPNqXybIny9WGhadIo/1Ofn8DBBgDynfYj8uZOR2ryme9ldZJ7uNXfg/GfS8fUvP/L5 rCqHDsKZM+xa1iwJX+gRCHfMVnsAk591zk0uilUI+ZL4xWiN8NS6C+dmX6OEdA4u1aThyWrQ/ou2 +v/lmX4Em37yFgrCB6NHRn1g+f3uncIqYSL3lhh5c81YyJqFoLZMmkWsaurVZfvqROaDnDtHb8z5 dpPkEuJ8Snwqla7jUnW3hy14Yji8fo+4xCnSRo4Rcu5Z37rMuDjCny5fE9ykbJ7I9co1MAEE3ruN Xsm8UJsAPvDcVSKtDCYkioPY5Qx4fJOk03R5fJtf/Dv/dkIzS7m4GUpXCY1Y3j3ilQ8EW2aDkYIa 2M5pALviQra5n1qAU0VTFRks+evUvJt4/KBJTQmtccHzRC9o5h0fpvZANIVy4awhhKWuA4fgvW2H gbVpRK3T9+h2PwMALJBCDNKptJgC25WyncdSmnVL8rdCp3Zd9clP8wSiJZWbJCg35R5vCGCRun6Y x0PkyFKGh3QknkBMfTFY6U48DbCJgTXg724gFzhHYUe+7aKm0vUpEB4jx8+QPF1FZz/qBx9mTi+J 2sBvM/O0p+zizleC4lU8fDj1CnRx+r4b/1Q/PZ/2ILv1dG1DGmLG9Zb+Up9tvOnCUbNPgcPcQwzM gKHyQxUo+ql2ySTkvEFH/23XMww2BnTTFGX5/yI4Ky+1ZJcbGqc5H4PEZHeoI/d6LWFf332z7LMw LGdoi9FMQ5j9dQUvMi1YKAun15JQSJLyCT5k+MTObVKxHy/dols381l9r9ft9daDonlwd6LnuX+J u10=
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine11.antispamcloud.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/lToQW2MrX4wroyIqgZyAvfqXnKM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2020 07:14:12 -0000
On 11/6/2020 9:55 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote: > On 2020-11-07, at 03:36, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: >> In the other 99% of the world everyone exchanges MS Word documents. I'm >> certainly not saying that's wonderful, but it's reality. > Hammer/nail. > > 99 % of the world is not collaboratively developing high-quality technical specifications, so I don’t care that much about those 99 % as a role model. A lot of the rest of the world is working collaboratively, including using commercial products like Microsoft's Office 365 to develop reports and other documents. Or rival products from other companies. Whether they are on par with our "high quality specifications" is debatable, but I have no doubt that at least some are. I am definitely not proposing that we immediately switch to using commercial products, but you cannot just dismiss the experience of all these users. > > I expect the minutes from the apartment owners’ meeting to be in MS-Word. > Or a random document from our university administration (which is slowly learning not to send around MS-Word documents as a replacement for emails :-). Sure. Sending iterative versions of large documents by e-mail is not exactly recommended practice. State of the art communication uses cloud services from that. Kind of the whole reason why Microsoft developed servers like SharePoint, or services like Office365. And of course Microsoft is not alone there, Google has services like that too, and quite a few other companies. Again, I am not advocating moving to such services. Just mentioning that they do in fact exist > But technical documents in the computer science department? Ha. > Gitlab, hackmd/codimd, and (in the math/theoretical computer science world) overleaf are our collaboration platforms. > > (My information security class uses markdown for all its assignments. > Even though that is not identified as a learning objective of that class, it creates great satisfaction to talk to alumni a couple of years later and hear unsolicited testimonials how they have weaned themselves off the time-wasting use of other formats.) It may very well be that ad hoc tools developed for our community end up better for us than generic tools developed by commercial companies. But you should not take that for granted. After all, the commercial success of these companies depends on keeping customers happy, and collaboration on documents, spreadsheets or other items is their bread-and-butter. -- Christian Huitema
- Re: A sad farewell Russ Housley
- A sad farewell Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: A sad farewell Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: A sad farewell Alissa Cooper
- RE: A sad farewell Ron Bonica
- Re: A sad farewell Barry Leiba
- Re: A sad farewell Suresh Krishnan
- Re: A sad farewell Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: A sad farewell Toerless Eckert
- Re: A sad farewell Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: A sad farewell Keith Moore
- Re: A sad farewell JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: A sad farewell Stephen Farrell
- Re: A sad farewell Daniel Migault
- Re: A sad farewell S Moonesamy
- Re: A sad farewell Charlie Perkins
- Re: A sad farewell Jay Daley
- Re: A sad farewell Loa Andersson
- Re: A sad farewell Soininen, Jonne (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
- Re: A sad farewell Dirk Kutscher
- Re: A sad farewell Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: A sad farewell Carsten Bormann
- Re: A sad farewell Lloyd W
- Re: A sad farewell Leif Johansson
- Re: A sad farewell Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: A sad farewell Julian Reschke
- Re: A sad farewell Ralph Droms
- Re: A sad farewell Brian E Carpenter
- Re: A sad farewell Benoit Claise
- Re: A sad farewell Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: A sad farewell Keith Moore
- Re: A sad farewell Joseph Touch
- Re: A sad farewell Jim Fenton
- Re: A sad farewell Alia Atlas
- RE: A sad farewell Valery Smyslov
- WAIT. Take a moment. Re: A sad farewell Eliot Lear
- Re: WAIT. Take a moment. Re: A sad farewell Alexander Pelov
- Re: WAIT. Take a moment. Re: A sad farewell Carsten Bormann
- Re: WAIT. Take a moment. Re: A sad farewell Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: A sad farewell Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: A sad farewell Mehmet Ersue
- RE: A sad farewell Eric Gray
- Re: A sad farewell Stewart Bryant
- Re: A sad farewell Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: A sad farewell Leif Johansson
- Re: A sad farewell Larry Masinter
- Re: A sad farewell Leif Johansson
- Re: A sad farewell Pete Resnick
- Re: A sad farewell Carsten Bormann
- Re: A sad farewell Joe Touch
- Re: A sad farewell Joel M. Halpern
- Re: A sad farewell Larry Masinter
- Re: A sad farewell Jay Daley
- Re: A sad farewell Joseph Touch
- Re: A sad farewell Larry Masinter
- Re: A sad farewell Brian E Carpenter
- Re: A sad farewell Jay Daley
- Re: A sad farewell Salz, Rich
- Re: A sad farewell Larry Masinter
- Re: A sad farewell Salz, Rich
- Re: A sad farewell Salz, Rich
- Re: A sad farewell Larry Masinter
- Re: A sad farewell Joseph Touch
- Re: A sad farewell Keith Moore
- Re: A sad farewell Masataka Ohta
- Re: A sad farewell Joseph Touch
- Re: A sad farewell Lloyd W
- Re: A sad farewell Leif Johansson
- discussion of tools and requirements Re: A sad fa… Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: A sad farewell Fernando Gont
- Re: A sad farewell Livingood, Jason
- Re: A sad farewell Livingood, Jason
- RE: A sad farewell Adrian Farrel
- Re: A sad farewell Livingood, Jason
- Re: A sad farewell Fernando Gont
- Re: A sad farewell Alissa Cooper
- Re: A sad farewell Salz, Rich
- Document diffs... Re: A sad farewell Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Document diffs... Re: A sad farewell Joseph Touch
- Re: Document diffs... Re: A sad farewell Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: A sad farewell tom petch
- Re: Document diffs... Re: A sad farewell Joseph Touch
- Re: A sad farewell Russ Housley
- Why we have situated software (Re: A sad farewell) Carsten Bormann
- Re: Why we have situated software (Re: A sad fare… Pete Resnick
- Why we have situated software (Re: A sad farewell) Carsten Bormann
- Re: Document diffs... Re: A sad farewell Carsten Bormann
- Re: A sad farewell Donald Eastlake
- and... text for the win Michael Richardson
- Re: and... text for the win John Levine
- Re: and... text for the win Carsten Bormann
- Re: and... text for the win Julian Reschke
- Re: and... text for the win Christian Huitema
- Re: and... text for the win Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: and... text for the win Carsten Bormann
- Re: and... text for the win Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: and... text for the win Charlie Perkins
- Re: A sad farewell Masataka Ohta
- What is going wrong? Was: A sad farewell Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: What is going wrong? Was: A sad farewell Masataka Ohta