IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D Action: draft-mishra-6man-variable-slaac-01.txt

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Thu, 05 November 2020 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976B13A1324; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 10:28:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U-A3pbm_6yeo; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 10:28:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com (mail-wr1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 934763A12D9; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 10:28:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id n18so2911893wrs.5; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 10:28:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=OZeoKQugitRUF+eRkn6gJeGtFgE5XuV7XkBPaD9iF/Q=; b=Q7a+b2fMe8KAF9T5VYp2NkzcoscWuOASfL83+KkwN9acwTn+fd+tMSSo6oTDjq+fRf 3Lmz3maqjUgABINU4Ia++0oJ4xuWH/jKwdb1HdpQYoHLUA3mSmEIubapf4FRaZ33ABmF tteTeGYNvntvEz56DVA1wCml5zc0LF0jQIdB/s/DGaAvynI6y1HLdiRb7iNihP3hKrZP 6/PVFni3n53vBLC2QrlngCKSINuphczdp8Tl0Ip0MFZKd8OwF8N8d5fA++Dl5+53aEtb cRXg5999KwmieKb2KMPEJte+3oJeCjdI8vwT6Fou7Cs35up8C1LgV19JPJktLtb4VKKd PtxQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=OZeoKQugitRUF+eRkn6gJeGtFgE5XuV7XkBPaD9iF/Q=; b=s2aYC/Ta2rrWcuKFmZumBnPypukJ+No9f7AtBLwRS4ehSOZfhDfWL+P/32eldWW6t0 /LHtSOoyYdPkBWtCB9J3l00EwKJDfFybbKovo6TzD+RCzIKke7NLNafcsEGd4dP89/Ai nvHimHcdH1n/4HHlVn+eTXsmlfpUc8uVUiD8Mv0xMZasjbxCr08agooL9udsaFgpI7jw vN4AaQiZo19Wps3i7DlrfcWY67Io/MSbpgEiN9W0ZBIeKrkYxNhyHzVRV5HUTjf47e5m nhpy69VKHEsbVajb4/V9uJ66J4Es9ZB1iEMqzvTB48hz6yM8RuaLzs9SPndS9vqF/7MO B0rg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532IBzoL1fjcrer+U459/E9w7oIuIVqb7IkJV20cgmXainSBYbV+ EkcXN4cR10hJpXv/S7NS8bu0mlAS+Cc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVa15JaF4YeryXG3UEF9fjUwsRevPinBABqWcvaYtRYHCbYzytpmn7jk+bavtGM/ys2286ig==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4bd1:: with SMTP id l17mr4822080wrt.38.1604600935785; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 10:28:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.199] (c-24-5-53-184.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.5.53.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h4sm3681192wrq.3.2020.11.05.10.28.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Nov 2020 10:28:54 -0800 (PST)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <23631B74-1870-4F53-9CC1-F884505E61D8@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5E0A8852-A634-4DF8-BE26-4922E3DEF86B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-mishra-6man-variable-slaac-01.txt
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 10:28:51 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr3h_Jypxx49-e-PUFvtX0y7DaXf-XvBgK4-oQAjEe8vvA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, draft-mishra-6man-variable-slaac@ietf.org
To: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <160409741426.1448.16934303750885888002@ietfa.amsl.com> <3c1c3ab5-5726-b141-e7ed-618984bbbdb1@gmail.com> <CABNhwV1zoZpZNjb54rEys4+49H3vpebZW2g9JbO1_58eR+WnQg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0vvyQnTGRoSh4qa4He1gq5HXXRaKU3pVLtCtDUzcwL_w@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGQPatbg5=OaMzxJXy5mGZai1bqLfg8f+9SUnfg=s1kADg@mail.gmail.com> <e55a9fbf-a93c-a96f-7991-f0c3aad8ce16@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGSTQjKQuY1+0DNm5NRgTRkWUQ=eRhnvyKCXvKc3Kvy9TQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3h_Jypxx49-e-PUFvtX0y7DaXf-XvBgK4-oQAjEe8vvA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/5N9LqEjy_FSFG19ScqqbritxCeE>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 18:29:00 -0000

Hi,

> Mobile providers have not deployed dhcp pd in the last 10 years.
> 
> As a mobile provider, my bet is the next 10 years may be no better.
> 
> Yet, rfc 7278 is deployed in many places in mobile
> 

If mobile providers have not implemented DHCP PD in the last 10 years, why would anyone expect them to implement some new mechanism with the similar functionality.   It seems to me that they don’t want to support functionality like this.

Bob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email