IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: the race to the bottom problem

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Sun, 08 November 2020 01:30 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308FC3A0E45 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 17:30:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1qkOWCU9c521 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 17:30:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2a.google.com (mail-io1-xd2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F30643A0E43 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 17:30:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2a.google.com with SMTP id t8so1725268iov.8 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 07 Nov 2020 17:30:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bFlnbRYtyZTequmlGEMJ6bRC/v77E2kXloYMedH8osw=; b=GquRVCKLf7bM/tCbhX9KL5WxHb0RyVyxsyXFh7XXKAK0TpKrPZHrWpJsuHyIkKzYxy ogMu3LaD8x/jqrJvd9ko9foJYNNKzCyaJorWbykOAjx1THrK5qk63XvAwB/fkuApVY42 LAAxg3akzxnftt90k/zw9sUrp0MqoVIafuOo1TwczMrpZ9x2P8ERWumPP8uKcZxM635h FX/RQVb/0nkobTxTIIHTv0enL5GQyDhC0Fbz/CohqM/e68vChccA2wbUQm2IQ4C0kaV3 eXkm7W+MUBvS5qeC0+lgsBEC/JgnRbHXmLOqlgp5H+5gZbmdIjDZ76Y/wWI3oF/+BWfQ BqbA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bFlnbRYtyZTequmlGEMJ6bRC/v77E2kXloYMedH8osw=; b=KuYUHOKLca89WhvxI5mDd5hAfUGCJ9ToCsA0p/xkpAIpcLmp0RpAp+fmRWoklSxjHV f66jB/euRZ0ADLsgHJt2HwYnJWm1lEadHTVVJClj9VHU+9frOb1Cpfr5HRLeazo4D8iA vc1rYMAbpcqE1mWSQUuvTXgO4RKBqviV+y8vdnJaDfGnGOUTi8gpsdzYLWe5NwKDQEVF jO2o1ADT765jWpjSmQiTh4bNv6R8PuqJgKpNKNPs0hLr2iiWxfsfZjcKSsPk7xTdFWdZ QSp//EIU7Rj9HhQf7OIg2ZZofi/VZf7e1uQexxi+A7JHDhmCSZ9u2bRvS72pWSmK1Vrv BXDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wjaEV7pyMgM672eZmi9th2dF/iBB4ntOHeBCCCzJE3FvRCJWl g+Yz/p6mywfhdnww6knQYBx60DRqzLE1DHMlhCr96Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxWJblhHC+m1aqEKns7G6cT+/5usVoaeaCkngsS95mxe6TmZES5IhYeqXL7WH1eVRDkqAHx/VRyCwpcqku+PWg=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9758:: with SMTP id c24mr5951658ioo.166.1604799029922; Sat, 07 Nov 2020 17:30:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <60a15726-ff04-a202-4df9-79a6c6f33540@foobar.org> <99B762B0-0370-4B5B-9075-F688284D614A@fugue.com> <190c5cf3-9034-4e38-235c-620ecd916750@foobar.org> <E66B9C17-A73D-45A5-9E22-5E5CD08C94E1@fugue.com> <CAD6AjGQK_JQH9HUyT-cFe8knV6exYdsBYLPaDGqq=XZhson7Kw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGQK_JQH9HUyT-cFe8knV6exYdsBYLPaDGqq=XZhson7Kw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 10:30:17 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0+pmXM5x6yTtLZjtqcA-uZqZjBW7UNpFeLGFV+yyqQPA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: the race to the bottom problem
To: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
Cc: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, "Mudric, Dusan" <dmudric@ciena.com>, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001dd3cf05b38e64c6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Sg1IlyHJwKk7sScLPQctyjCT1Fg>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 01:30:32 -0000

On Sun, 8 Nov 2020, 10:06 Ca By, <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:

> ISPS are handing out /64s. This was mentioned in the thread. This is all
>> the evidence you need that there has been a race to the bottom.
>>
>
> This is only evidence that dhcpv6-pd does not meet the need in mobile.
>
> Ietf failed. Try harder.
>

So fix it. :-) Write something up, and if there is rough consensus we will
implement it.

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email