Re: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: the race to the bottom problem

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Sun, 08 November 2020 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=1581810f94=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A183A09C6 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 11:46:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v5y7gzO5PqxR for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 11:46:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:495::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCDE3A09C1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 11:46:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1604864766; x=1605469566; i=jordi.palet@consulintel.es; q=dns/txt; h=User-Agent:Date: Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:References:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; bh=dFe0CdjB idimSFZUVTjjxf/Wbw2nExpVUGTTtWj0fTE=; b=SSPvos1rK9+a+GqD+8e+XE2G 0rIRiN5/Zrgk4PfhKo95mfsR93CRLEV109HaPKSxezR8zL+5q/IgfJcTOQ7XIPYm 8nMO0QwxaxUyKoR8Lqdx+92tzNQ2ya+B5AkB0ZejD3SPJ7DyfJ3W3K7gpvJdb7a2 hKy44raqdeZE4majkp4=
X-MDAV-Result: clean
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Sun, 08 Nov 2020 20:46:06 +0100
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Sun, 08 Nov 2020 20:46:05 +0100
Received: from [10.10.10.141] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v16.5.2) with ESMTPA id md50000458079.msg for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 20:46:05 +0100
X-MDRemoteIP: 2001:470:1f09:495:88f0:28ca:9d5e:dbcd
X-MDHelo: [10.10.10.141]
X-MDArrival-Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 20:46:05 +0100
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Return-Path: prvs=1581810f94=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ipv6@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.42.20101102
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 20:46:05 +0100
Subject: Re: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: the race to the bottom problem
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C57EA657-2364-4285-98D6-7BB5BC605809@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: the race to the bottom problem
References: <160409741426.1448.16934303750885888002@ietfa.amsl.com> <3c1c3ab5-5726-b141-e7ed-618984bbbdb1@gmail.com> <CABNhwV1zoZpZNjb54rEys4+49H3vpebZW2g9JbO1_58eR+WnQg@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV3L7kz=cWu8s3X=djVf4MCwewzbEgx09TWaKzCULCjYUQ@mail.gmail.com> <9A9CE8E7-3552-4FD8-A50E-1BDCA2CB813F@employees.org> <CABNhwV0LxM7EuKo2wNtVacjewsVqdhrmSiVBmB_EL-mqJYdU3A@mail.gmail.com> <CD9F9F09-2CBC-4A72-99C0-4A9A470357ED@employees.org> <9e787ed0-a221-e413-e030-ac2553dffc8e@gmail.com> <a21c9447-730b-e2c0-81f6-46deda57f507@gmail.com> <f4635fa9-45ca-f7ec-40a2-41764e1ca74f@si6networks.com> <905bcc26-a223-53d0-6675-c35579b9a8be@gmail.com> <AAE75F7F-F8DF-4B7F-9C50-3D6C91544997@ciena.com> <2b59b2de-3597-8d35-374d-75e9b10d4d83@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2zUvDE2ZSCnZa_525Hj7OthhEoDGZcd0D9xxZVW3D8aeg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTSSe+WaO-GFX5erjCVN27SLh=P6YN5uDBnCN7Wjcfb4g@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2zQqw9prXFnVGsH3U2MWCe12L442Fk8cApMc0FbgkG6NA@mail.gmail.com> <26337.1604719436@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <26337.1604719436@localhost>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/CkN_eZaoORM7__PYJ0x1GFJuLGc>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 19:46:11 -0000

There are many ISPs offering IPv6. I never hear of any that doesn't use DHCPv6-PD to allocate /48, /56, some do /60, very few do /64 and we shall train them to understand that this is incorrect.

There is no technical neither cost reason (in terms of RIRs cost for getting a bigger IPv6 block), to allocate smaller prefixes for customers. The only reason they some time to /56 instead of /48 is "marketing" to differentiate business from residential customers. Nothing else.

Many ISPs do persistent prefixes.

Again, see RIPE-690 and https://indico.uknof.org.uk/event/41/contributions/542/attachments/712/866/bcop-ipv6-prefix-v9.pdf (look for the survey slides at the 2nd part).

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
 
 

El 7/11/20 4:24, "ipv6 en nombre de Michael Richardson" <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org en nombre de mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> escribió:


    Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> wrote:
        >> Why are the isps not giving more than one 64 ?
        >>
        >> Is it because the ietf made it hard and dhcp-pd is unworkable ,

        > There are multiple production residential deployments of DHCPv6-PD.

        > I worked on one that was deployed in 2010. I then used it for the next
        > 8 years, and only moved away to another provider (and employer) where
        > it is in beta.

    That's much cool.
    It's very useful to hear of such successes!

    A question: was it easy to assign static subnets to the customers?

    My ISP initially statically routed my /56 to me, and then when they turned on
    PD, they now send me three subnets. One statically, and apparently two by
    DHCPv6-PD which they say they can't turn off/fix.  Very weird.
    Well.... they aren't present today.

        > Telstra here in Australia have also been deploying it for a number of
        > years in production.

        > Sky in the UK have deployed PD to 5 million subscribers.

        > PD is very workable, and a number of people have made it work.

    Maybe RIPE would do a survey to understand what has these things so
    successful so that others can repeat it!

    --
    Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
               Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
    ipv6@ietf.org
    Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
    --------------------------------------------------------------------



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.