Re: the race to the bottom problem

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 06 November 2020 14:15 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4D53A11CA; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 06:15:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.423
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.423 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wa3znYyKqRnA; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 06:14:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA1363A11C8; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 06:14:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 0A6EEsr6012670; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 15:14:54 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DB1C20751D; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 15:14:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583E9207478; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 15:14:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 0A6EEsE4014631; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 15:14:54 +0100
Subject: Re: the race to the bottom problem
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, otroan@employees.org, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Cc: draft-mishra-6man-variable-slaac@ietf.org, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <160409741426.1448.16934303750885888002@ietfa.amsl.com> <3c1c3ab5-5726-b141-e7ed-618984bbbdb1@gmail.com> <CABNhwV1zoZpZNjb54rEys4+49H3vpebZW2g9JbO1_58eR+WnQg@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV3L7kz=cWu8s3X=djVf4MCwewzbEgx09TWaKzCULCjYUQ@mail.gmail.com> <9A9CE8E7-3552-4FD8-A50E-1BDCA2CB813F@employees.org> <CABNhwV0LxM7EuKo2wNtVacjewsVqdhrmSiVBmB_EL-mqJYdU3A@mail.gmail.com> <CD9F9F09-2CBC-4A72-99C0-4A9A470357ED@employees.org> <9e787ed0-a221-e413-e030-ac2553dffc8e@gmail.com> <a21c9447-730b-e2c0-81f6-46deda57f507@gmail.com> <f4635fa9-45ca-f7ec-40a2-41764e1ca74f@si6networks.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <905bcc26-a223-53d0-6675-c35579b9a8be@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 15:14:53 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f4635fa9-45ca-f7ec-40a2-41764e1ca74f@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/q49vGrawMHlQPdQsKnEVFyrf9h4>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 14:15:01 -0000


Le 06/11/2020 à 11:36, Fernando Gont a écrit :
> On 6/11/20 07:04, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>> I have been reminded in private about 'race to the bottom'.
>> 
>> In the Variable SLAAC solution draft we do touch on the problem:
>> 
>>> The "race to the bottom problem" - is the problem where allowing
>>>  prefixes longer than 64 to be used in SLAAC will lead to 65, 66
>>> and so on, up to 127 and 128 allocations.  At that point the
>>> bottom would be reached and thus impossible to extend the network
>>> further.
>> 
>> A solution is then proposed in section 8 titled "Greater than 64
>> bit prefix usage by ISPs is strictly prohibited".
> 
> Then we'd need an RFC for formally creating the Internet
> police/militia. (possibly a very bad timing for an already bad
> idea).

So we need to attenuate that 'strictly prohibited' wording and improve a
way forward.

Alex

> 
> Thanks,