IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ubituiti APs and IPv6 (Re: Market forces)

Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> Mon, 09 November 2020 12:55 UTC

Return-Path: <jared@puck.nether.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105B53A1075 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 04:55:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cjdo_S--gtOV for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 04:55:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC6393A0AC3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 04:55:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.129] (unknown [23.138.112.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by puck.nether.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83AA654018D; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 07:55:25 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Subject: Re: ubituiti APs and IPv6 (Re: Market forces)
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011091351060.15604@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 07:55:25 -0500
Cc: Simon Hobson <linux@thehobsons.co.uk>, 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0662093C-614E-41CB-B501-8548A715B803@puck.nether.net>
References: <160409741426.1448.16934303750885888002@ietfa.amsl.com> <3c1c3ab5-5726-b141-e7ed-618984bbbdb1@gmail.com> <CABNhwV1zoZpZNjb54rEys4+49H3vpebZW2g9JbO1_58eR+WnQg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0vvyQnTGRoSh4qa4He1gq5HXXRaKU3pVLtCtDUzcwL_w@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV13gggo9XfRvrR31bCUptZuAiosK5ebMmnzDdinKqmrBw@mail.gmail.com> <B7B3091C-92E0-482A-8D16-AD6DCFD1E714@isc.org> <CAD6AjGSCnG_fyorW2-tEqzzTfj897Knf55-0QV9DPcDKt45VOA@mail.gmail.com> <F323E4EB-5AAA-4C34-9EA2-06D4A0839308@thehobsons.co.uk> <77C70939-13F9-4B04-BEF1-F6894EA1C09C@fugue.com> <1522C532-EAE5-42A1-9B66-08883A90D2D8@thehobsons.co.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011091351060.15604@uplift.swm.pp.se>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike=40swm.pp.se@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/jXdr60eDuZTM3mzlwede_rsz-2U>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 12:55:28 -0000


> On Nov 9, 2020, at 7:53 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike=40swm.pp.se@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2020, Simon Hobson wrote:
> 
>>> Other vendors also do not support this, one fairly popular brand is Ubiquiti that I see a lot of, which doesn't support sub-PD.
>> 
>> Unless they've fixed that, their access points also filter out IPv6 altogether (ibtables rule IIRC).
> 
> Afaik this is on the guest lan / captive portal stuff. I personally have ubiquiti APs and running them in standard WPA2-PSK config they support IPv6 just fine (one might want to tweak DTIM though, but that has nothing to do with ebfilter).

Yes, I turned off the captive portal stuff because of the lack of a redirect on IPv6 to the captive portal and the way they implemented it.  You can workaround it, but it’s basically just letting v6 through, so you’ll see the captive portal when you reach things on v4 but not v6.

- Jared


https://community.ui.com/questions/IPV6-on-Guest-network/61fe37c4-b0a7-4fb7-b97b-49b6a7063caf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email