Re: I-D Action: draft-mishra-6man-variable-slaac-01.txt

[Gyan Mishra <[e-mail]>]

RIPE-690 is primarily in the context of flash renumbering events by wired
broadband Carriers.

That does not apply to mobile carriers - mobile handsets.


On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 1:26 PM Gyan Mishra <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 11:53 AM Philip Homburg <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> >We could also write an RFC BCOP that the minimum requirement allocation
>> is
>> >a /64 and that operators must abide by that.
>> >
>> >We could also develop a RIPE doc and publish with ISOC that mandates the
>> >standard as well as work with all operator groups worldwide to ensure
>> they
>> >abide by the BCOP.
>>
>> If mobile providers don't comply with RIPE-690 (and many other documents
>> that
>> tell ISPs that just providing a /64 is not enough), then why do you expect
>> that any new documents have any effect?
>>
>>     RIPE-690 is for wired broadband not mobile operators.  Mobile
> operators have always used /64.  For mobile operators guidance when making
> your phone a mobile hotspot RFC 7278 provides guidance but its still a /64
> and not a larger space.
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7278
>
>
> --
>
> <http://www.verizon.com/>
>
> *Gyan Mishra*
>
> *Network Solutions A**rchitect *
>
>
>
> *M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD
>
> --

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *



*M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD