IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D Action: draft-mishra-6man-variable-slaac-01.txt

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Wed, 04 November 2020 18:26 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04FBB3A14B5 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 10:26:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.683
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.683 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BEnfsbqURH1V for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 10:26:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe34.google.com (mail-vs1-xe34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 580093A14B2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 10:26:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe34.google.com with SMTP id b3so12020208vsc.5 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 10:26:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=I5cYfycTHrD76zh8XnaOjBOXyElcY+iDUKjip1dUT5U=; b=pZpAd+ZaAvvEMUTb344d18QgVE7fLUAWUHYtcirvLbj5ykEt8dNxTLWyIxg1OpXQWK eysJRDJaf/mTtoTziU8LLvc+I3+xsdS8KfeSpONnB9Wqqvp5/SrV11LFZjPN3YkhoUB6 +ecobYwwm5JNrdNZl62O8NnXiXTkRiKoU9I1Ep8GaRNHQb5bwng8RSl2Atj49eE4Br4a erlpdrSUs4/T7/XVHiwLEgmM38kEPL04MNDOEDag7QP4VWSF1kXUeZ4UekxOoDpkpj4r amqyz09t2n1irx/3E2qtuf7YCMPnoXG9CsNvm6a8A153FVc4Zb3cMcLdS0Y3eNklamrr HsAw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=I5cYfycTHrD76zh8XnaOjBOXyElcY+iDUKjip1dUT5U=; b=jrwRQ0thcCuuSOTfhxm63VjLVacXHjR/Udkqp87HlnxjnQ3rfm+rC/7VuQccALpRbZ ETiCD+LssjADvJWI3xFL5xvuTyE8evFjNIZChuH/YXRbUq6n9DJYr7XUMaAdKW3X60fV Gr+KjHb2xfdJ0q/PCfuwIbbIfpGEXXVmVBAdV1diLewRYNWKEtin8/WgEDtuW3MiQW3D 2NI3wvFOEUzrOY8Vl8zGXJTdUWD8RyTsSYTl6qYVVLsRsttWi5/hzoUCKQpOT5zkKYkk LXAC+pE7Yks8ce3XKB7UnxB+IpwLvGJArb6alS//0nK2TdflWPR7yoBdtGofVBaGlC3Y fjPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533LWrK/ytwJEW5zAX0cjoxsqm0JVNGM0momT5fTnrQWjijKMJvc J34gxtqrSsuJnUZkhy5LlFMMaI/yVEzRpZTUhz/dkGjoivBQ+A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw8TC4jabmvYmoyMFI0eATtjBjW9U6GRv3E8QynA5yjJbLA34GeJupdH4A4eGZFVJhypmC/qxTXfeDv5h+jevA=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:ec10:: with SMTP id d16mr5538908vso.33.1604514402184; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 10:26:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160409741426.1448.16934303750885888002@ietfa.amsl.com> <3c1c3ab5-5726-b141-e7ed-618984bbbdb1@gmail.com> <CABNhwV1zoZpZNjb54rEys4+49H3vpebZW2g9JbO1_58eR+WnQg@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV3L7kz=cWu8s3X=djVf4MCwewzbEgx09TWaKzCULCjYUQ@mail.gmail.com> <9A9CE8E7-3552-4FD8-A50E-1BDCA2CB813F@employees.org> <CABNhwV0LxM7EuKo2wNtVacjewsVqdhrmSiVBmB_EL-mqJYdU3A@mail.gmail.com> <CD9F9F09-2CBC-4A72-99C0-4A9A470357ED@employees.org> <CABNhwV1WmnQ_vt31t0eUTiEhsi3Du+X+XPafRNv1BgvZS+TPGA@mail.gmail.com> <m1kaM2K-0000J1C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
In-Reply-To: <m1kaM2K-0000J1C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 13:26:31 -0500
Message-ID: <CABNhwV3uODOD7_fWhZzSNrw+P8ftR5D5QAiK65FNXCs+NrmE_w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-mishra-6man-variable-slaac-01.txt
To: Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-6@u-1.phicoh.com>
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fab1f205b34c1e46"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/VyGweH-1AyeC6vgu0HqhNC9X-j8>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 18:26:45 -0000

On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 11:53 AM Philip Homburg <
pch-ipv6-ietf-6@u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:

> >We could also write an RFC BCOP that the minimum requirement allocation is
> >a /64 and that operators must abide by that.
> >
> >We could also develop a RIPE doc and publish with ISOC that mandates the
> >standard as well as work with all operator groups worldwide to ensure they
> >abide by the BCOP.
>
> If mobile providers don't comply with RIPE-690 (and many other documents
> that
> tell ISPs that just providing a /64 is not enough), then why do you expect
> that any new documents have any effect?
>
>     RIPE-690 is for wired broadband not mobile operators.  Mobile
operators have always used /64.  For mobile operators guidance when making
your phone a mobile hotspot RFC 7278 provides guidance but its still a /64
and not a larger space.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7278


-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *



*M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email