IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: the race to the bottom problem

Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> Sun, 08 November 2020 01:06 UTC

Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E263A0E37 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 17:06:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QCzcr4xWU0Hr for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 17:06:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EB683A0E2F for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 17:06:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id u21so6168096iol.12 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 07 Nov 2020 17:06:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+aCD93oisU56vjc+4g5qQ0/fyYPGu0EtT19rtzrPQJs=; b=TzeRKWfAy+xhGxGHQ363VS2CATsgkx5F/NaVXiWKGXioNrDdm1Tv+yXQR32xnenl1c j2BQhSxQxgzzbIkj7zCa/ukIYjeqC3smlBlckaiQneHWuHA2P3mToXCCKsyiiSx1Kthi 5/3fuShxhQvc+kKdHSdEZcep+PCpPnWPADihPtwU9H7HURmD1dfw7p4K1OjXKPLAXOI0 xbiT1dkSzb5L6Xkam6msfhRpbf3wZznM36RwfBWbfq7IwVyeCwwRZPphe19URPNYIY7V tSpAUSbf/fb1bFLV9piGY3VTs3ZXP5B+OJQuWR6f2ysjLMViX5C7mC0VHYpNK7RCY1mi 2dcg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+aCD93oisU56vjc+4g5qQ0/fyYPGu0EtT19rtzrPQJs=; b=KWCz72poLO/MGS4WuXgTBg1Y6o71mgC7r+ZHzkbNIDHgQBc2rh4tfzKbkA8Py9aMVB JENHhEpmhg/U9eiUQIUyYwq2f8WUFdRNvODnvAm7qM3R5yFzwy0uzMclyvvErWPVMYFS RXOJW676smW9xY94MH535cuGPwc0i/GeruvojNugaNZ+xa7EqAA4ft4mGGaCb0p8Waea pFYdFITQZKZV4YwFEQXHHEwHAI4DGtjbRr9hY2d/ywpFXsoJGbdBvVKxYyu0b4f2Z2B1 ZQ9Ch3RY/n2GEHL7it6t/8OW9MbbRhQWsPPYY2S2p8HVXiPO26EicAZuv6UFD9Xxn2UQ 935A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532DWEXit/Rr4swNA55Q9Z9p/VLzEmcyx6sUBxpWAXgTQBbrfA92 Z6Pqz7iyUy5Ut5ZqcbVD/pQFX55P0MeiVcyAuik=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzo2tGMT2YnNuG02mA/UkM1Ozj+cXMM+3NNar97DHtFjdKycmqf6/XoJn3BiaW4Ugqw0AylgX6UNwxn+A7H+zM=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:dc01:: with SMTP id b1mr6037790iok.42.1604797568908; Sat, 07 Nov 2020 17:06:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <60a15726-ff04-a202-4df9-79a6c6f33540@foobar.org> <99B762B0-0370-4B5B-9075-F688284D614A@fugue.com> <190c5cf3-9034-4e38-235c-620ecd916750@foobar.org> <E66B9C17-A73D-45A5-9E22-5E5CD08C94E1@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <E66B9C17-A73D-45A5-9E22-5E5CD08C94E1@fugue.com>
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2020 17:05:58 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGQK_JQH9HUyT-cFe8knV6exYdsBYLPaDGqq=XZhson7Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: the race to the bottom problem
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "Mudric, Dusan" <dmudric=40ciena.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000801cb05b38e0d45"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/aGhwJcJJGbJtx4FwuNN-2I-UpvQ>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 01:06:12 -0000

On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 5:04 PM Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:

> On Nov 7, 2020, at 6:24 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
>
> So I politely ask you again: please provide citations to data.  Then we
> can have a discussion.
>
>
> ISPS are handing out /64s. This was mentioned in the thread. This is all
> the evidence you need that there has been a race to the bottom.
>

This is only evidence that dhcpv6-pd does not meet the need in mobile.

Ietf failed. Try harder.


> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email