Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses
Arifumi Matsumoto <arifumi@nttv6.net> Tue, 08 May 2012 12:01 UTC
Return-Path: <arifumi@nttv6.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5546121F84FF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2012 05:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 591RG+Q1Pbqh for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2012 05:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leo.nttv6.net (leo.nttv6.net [192.47.162.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64AC321F84D1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 May 2012 05:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.nttv6.net [127.0.0.1]) by leo.nttv6.net (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q48C0Wn4038370; Tue, 8 May 2012 21:00:32 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from arifumi@nttv6.net)
Subject: Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Arifumi Matsumoto <arifumi@nttv6.net>
In-Reply-To: <4FA4CB7A.4060103@globis.net>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 20:59:14 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B424E962-EF78-43B0-8ECC-90C85BEC9247@nttv6.net>
References: <4F716D5C.40402@innovationslab.net> <4F726C9E.50107@gmail.com> <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B5054C1@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <4F83D8D0.5030402@gmail.com> <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B508719@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <4F858C32.6060709@globis.net> <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B50CBC2@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <4F87D4EA.4040801@globis.net> <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B513879@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <4F8935C7.6020602@globis.net> <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B5159E0@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B5AF1C5@TK5EX14MBXW605.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <4FA4CB7A.4060103@globis.net>
To: Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 12:01:27 -0000
Dave and Ray, thanks for putting together regarding these points. I'll compile these into the revision of DHCP option draft soon. Thanks ! On 2012/05/05, at 15:40, Ray Hunter wrote: > ACK. Thanks. > > Dave Thaler wrote: >> I wrote in response to Ray Hunter: >>> I take your comment as asking for a summary table in rfc 3484bis of >>> system-wide config options. That could be done as a purely editorial >>> change, although if there's only 1 thing in the table it's less interesting. >>> But if others in the WG think this would be helpful, then yes we can do that. >> >> Turns out there were already 2 things so I've done this in -03. >> >> OLD: >> This specification optionally allows for the possibility of >> administrative configuration of policy (e.g., via manual >> configuration or a DHCP option such as that proposed in >> [I-D.ietf-6man-addr-select-opt]) that can override the default >> behavior of the algorithms. The policy override takes the form of a >> configurable table that specifies precedence values and preferred >> source prefixes for destination prefixes. If an implementation is >> not configurable, or if an implementation has not been configured, >> then the default policy table specified in this document SHOULD be >> used. >> >> NEW: >> This specification optionally allows for the possibility of >> administrative configuration of policy (e.g., via manual >> configuration or a DHCP option such as that proposed in >> [I-D.ietf-6man-addr-select-opt]) that can override the default >> behavior of the algorithms. The policy override consists of the >> following set of state, which SHOULD be configurable: >> >> o Policy Table (Section 2.1): a table that specifies precedence >> values and preferred source prefixes for destination prefixes. >> o Automatic Row Additions flag (Section 2.1): a flag that specifies >> whether the implementation may automatically add site-specific >> rows for certain types of addresses. >> o Privacy Preference flag (Section 5): a flag that specifies whether >> temporary source addresses or stable source addresses are >> preferred by default, when both types exist. >> >> This is purely an editorial change. The rest of Ray's comments apply >> to I-D.ietf-6man-addr-select-opt, which is already informatively >> referenced in the above text. >> >> -Dave >> >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Arifumi Matsumoto NGN System Architecture Project NTT Service Integration Laboratories E-mail: arifumi@nttv6.net TEL +81-422-59-3334 FAX +81-422-59-6364
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Jong-Hyouk Lee
- 3484bis and privacy addresses Brian Haberman
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Arifumi Matsumoto
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Teemu Savolainen
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Francis Dupont
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Mohacsi Janos
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Tim Chown
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Roland Bless
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Samita Chakrabarti
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Simon Perreault
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Alex Abrahams
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Tina TSOU
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Wuyts Carl
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Karl Auer
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Karl Auer
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Fernando Gont
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Francis Dupont
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Fernando Gont
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Brian Haberman
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Fernando Gont
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Fernando Gont
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Sander Steffann
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dominik Elsbroek
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Karl Auer
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses STARK, BARBARA H
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Karl Auer
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Brian E Carpenter
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Roger Jørgensen
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Francis Dupont
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses jonne.soininen
- Re: Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Doug Barton
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses t.petch
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Alex Abrahams
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Doug Barton
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Mark Andrews
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Fernando Gont
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses james woodyatt
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Brian E Carpenter
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- Re: RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- RE: RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Dave Thaler
- Re: RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses Ray Hunter
- Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses Arifumi Matsumoto