IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Fri, 30 March 2012 16:47 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F62F21F850D for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EE1BzbJZmvBU for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:47:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from srv01.bbserve.nl (unknown [IPv6:2a02:27f8:1025:18::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E07521F84E7 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:47:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lputeaux-156-15-30-250.w82-127.abo.wanadoo.fr ([82.127.29.250] helo=[192.168.101.212]) by srv01.bbserve.nl with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <fgont@si6networks.com>) id 1SDeyZ-0004VF-NU; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:46:59 +0200
Message-ID: <4F75E38C.4060008@si6networks.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:47:08 +0200
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Organization: SI6 Networks
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/3.1.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Subject: Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses
References: <4F716D5C.40402@innovationslab.net> <4F71F217.7000209@globis.net> <03d301cd0d97$b3361060$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <CAFnCNEdWUFDjoCBKeZYiCwEjvAepqK2ZXrsy+yoKmQze5vwKmQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F74F78F.1020002@dougbarton.us> <20120330002434.F30DA1F3C24B@drugs.dv.isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120330002434.F30DA1F3C24B@drugs.dv.isc.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:47:38 -0000

On 03/30/2012 02:24 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message <4F74F78F.1020002@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes:
>>
>> Also, if you're on a home network, it doesn't matter what the bottom 64
>> bits are, your network prefix is enough information for the bad guys to
>> use as ICBM targeting coordinates.
> 
> And if we want to address home networks then we need a way to signal
> that we want both stable and temporary prefixes with PD and a way
> to differentiate them when advertising them via RA. 

Please see:
<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-gont-6man-managing-slaac-policy-00.txt>

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email