Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 no IPv6 prohibition on the control channel

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 10 February 2017 12:39 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C641296A3 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 04:39:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.333
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.333 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uM4hjFc_OXzo for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 04:39:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C331A1295E0 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 04:39:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id v1ACd0AZ004541; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:39:00 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FB8B207FBE; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:39:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12383202B67; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:39:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v1ACcx9J008507; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:38:59 +0100
To: Jérôme Härri <jerome.haerri@eurecom.fr>, its@ietf.org
References: <148052970170.9607.12043916621198119260.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <fc5883da-dd62-e846-b8ea-9f3cf8a867b1@cea.fr> <012501d28395$4e5429b0$eafc7d10$@eurecom.fr>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6da89922-9055-6499-aa9f-8a866ea9f4d5@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:38:31 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <012501d28395$4e5429b0$eafc7d10$@eurecom.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/3Qc3-LOMwP19jsvBzUleVokbmGo>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 no IPv6 prohibition on the control channel
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:39:06 -0000


Le 10/02/2017 à 13:00, Jérôme Härri a écrit :
> Hello Alex,
>
> As discussed, there is a strick prohibition from ETSI and IEEE WAVE.
> But, as this work will not use it, we do not need to comply with it.
> We only need to comply with national spectrum regulations...whatever
> is in there...
>
> I would however suggest to add the following statement:
> "Transmissions of IPv6 packets on ITS spectrum SHALL comply with the
> national spectrum regulations, which MAY lead to restrictions on IP
> operations using IEEE 802.11-2016 in OCB mode."

Jérôme,

I agree with the first part, that I can add.

The national spectrum regulation in the country where I live does not
lead to restrictions on IP operations using 802.11 in OCB mode.

So I could say:
> "Transmissions of IPv6 packets on ITS spectrum SHALL comply with the
> national spectrum regulations, which MAY NOT lead to restrictions on
> IP operations using IEEE 802.11-2016 in OCB mode."

Alex

>
> I think this leaves flexibility for this WG to propose solutions..
>
> BR,
>
> Jérôme
>
> -----Original Message----- From: its [mailto:its-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Alexandre Petrescu Sent: Friday 10 February 2017 12:05 To:
> its@ietf.org Subject: [ipwave]
> draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 no IPv6 prohibition on the
> control channel
>
> draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 no IPv6 prohibition on the
> control channel
>
> Hello IPWAVErs,
>
> We received a comment stating that LCC/OBE does not prohibit the use
> of IPv6 on the control channel.  (I do not understand what the
> commenter meant meant by "LCC" - typo for FCC, LLC? or Lower Control
> Channel? but that's another issue).
>
> As such I will remove the following text:
>> On another hand, at IEEE, IPv6 is explicitely prohibited on channel
>>  number 178 decimal - the FCC's 'Control Channel'.  The document
>> [ieeep1609.4-D9-2010] prohibits upfront the use of IPv6 traffic on
>> the Control Channel: 'data frames containing IP datagrams are only
>> allowed on service channels'.  Other 'Service Channels' are allowed
>> to use IP, but the Control Channel is not.
>
> There are many other reasons for removing that text that we discussed
> here extensively.
>
> Alex
>
>
>