IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 no IPv6 prohibition on the control channel

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 10 February 2017 11:05 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F1C12711D for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 03:05:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.017
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.017 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cCrHebVD6fcZ for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 03:05:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EB431270B4 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 03:05:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id v1AB5UcC001081 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:05:30 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id C8F27202B67 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:05:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE95A202986 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:05:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v1AB5Uin023512 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:05:30 +0100
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
To: "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>
References: <148052970170.9607.12043916621198119260.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Organization: CEA
Message-ID: <fc5883da-dd62-e846-b8ea-9f3cf8a867b1@cea.fr>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:05:01 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <148052970170.9607.12043916621198119260.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms090806060602030204070306"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/Avlzcak9SbeKirZVNtr2H1VVN0Y>
Subject: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 no IPv6 prohibition on the control channel
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:05:34 -0000

draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00
no IPv6 prohibition on the control channel

Hello IPWAVErs,

We received a comment stating that LCC/OBE does not prohibit the use of
IPv6 on the control channel.  (I do not understand what the commenter
meant meant by "LCC" - typo for FCC, LLC? or Lower Control Channel? but
that's another issue).

As such I will remove the following text:
> On another hand, at IEEE, IPv6 is explicitely prohibited on channel
> number 178 decimal - the FCC's 'Control Channel'.  The document
> [ieeep1609.4-D9-2010] prohibits upfront the use of IPv6 traffic on
> the Control Channel: 'data frames containing IP datagrams are only
> allowed on service channels'.  Other 'Service Channels' are allowed
> to use IP, but the Control Channel is not.

There are many other reasons for removing that text that we discussed
here extensively.

Alex

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email