IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 RSU term

Michelle Wetterwald <mlwetterwald@gmail.com> Fri, 10 February 2017 11:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mlwetterwald@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343AB12951D for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 03:18:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1YNzBpLmdRxo for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 03:18:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x233.google.com (mail-yw0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBB43129412 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 03:18:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x233.google.com with SMTP id v200so19171159ywc.3 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 03:18:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/S0l922XQmBmMiJ5enZtxuIoYPAGjwk0ARdZBasCOdk=; b=bi6s/r4++qOkr+nExyh/cZ9fhlL0rncj/ClD7bIaFsDSKXKjWzpx4osqfR3yP2pHeG h/c4y0fkyMgJiTKL5ArHaiBKWctsFUkahBnKHhBoe+Rs2i+VwaB3q0SAXjX0QA90EYa8 9Lq914ZPBbQXBKX1+VsXGofFvTxDbRMt89ftkwpKTu0PML3qTRdQxc/uJ4dp2cRFqnpa xYgjz6bDTrzhna9vFTQgP3+U/6N0BZITSRr4a/wyqOBUeyFTKawuCsb8f6NF1svSPmJQ cA6ktbfxTRNNyZLVMv55r+JAhZx6XoUcfUsDL3SuSR14i400mT+9o6Rknv0oeQZkCQ1X ed1Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/S0l922XQmBmMiJ5enZtxuIoYPAGjwk0ARdZBasCOdk=; b=jfz+b0dHHeY3aGohk0j6eLMzcBAVNnnDo9mRXOPWPkFsSlGvwEUFpKXbbE12Tkoa5C b0JhlebUg0sJNgG3WTFnmgfGoDJjP9aPnq7Pz6B4qbcR66LLUdsiZk9TBIr4jUF9QVZJ TLzbb1wutbMSDkDxti4pfhmY4pVgZB6ctDUeWi7FpbFfg0t1idJgpLdAOC+9BbbVmVSz WSlxj4SggiV1VDfSVbPdonV1taoxk8BJxcPzgNbuOdK7Xid3R9Jrjdg4OF0QjSpJcBP6 1maEzybWtaY6lNU0+k9z1HWTnEjTNulMjO9Bsw0+d9IhYhQ6bTZ+ASF1VQ92+HhBTeJp gsMw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lZ1ETEvtrXgid+YiAmOYthd6v8CgMucAn74s5q4f4LqNYBVQmxXtAbr6/SSEXqoKOt8hBT9YLYOTqQcA==
X-Received: by 10.13.247.71 with SMTP id h68mr6517677ywf.136.1486725535228; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 03:18:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.59.82 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 03:18:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <d3cdd725-160f-b3cc-540b-00bbcec797c7@cea.fr>
References: <148052970170.9607.12043916621198119260.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <d3cdd725-160f-b3cc-540b-00bbcec797c7@cea.fr>
From: Michelle Wetterwald <mlwetterwald@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:18:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CAF5de8t4TjMK5uLc4XK6O7WAsrd6LPCM29=UoNNg7VZS+6VVYQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0bd7b267ea4f05482b43f1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/cEtXIvs68LpPutGS1Pgp0hvRV3A>
Cc: "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 RSU term
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:18:57 -0000

Hi Alex,

Actually, an RSU is generally more than an RSR as it is an ITS station per
se and may contain upper (e.g. service or even application) layers.
I suggest to keep the definition of RSU in the text, as it is a widely used
term, but clarify that an RSR could be one of the components of an RSU.

Best regards,
Michelle

2017-02-10 11:34 GMT+01:00 Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
:

> draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00
> RSU term
>
> Hello IPWAVErs,
>
> We received multiple comments about the RSU term.  The strongest issue
> is that apparently there are conflicts between our assumption of RSU to
> be a router and FHWA(?) thinking RSU is more like an interface to a
> router, or something like a master-RSU controlling (slave?) RSUs.
> Unless FHWA tells us they agree RSU is a router, I will modify the
> following:
>
> Old:
>
>> 2.  Terminology
>>
> [...]
>
>> RSU: Road Side Unit.
>>
>
> New:
>
>> RSR: Road Side Router; an IP router equipped with, or connected to,
>> at least one interface that is 802.11 and that is an interface that
>> operates in OCB mode.
>>
>
> and substitute RSR for RSU throughout.
>
> This old 'RSU' term, now RSR, is absolutely needed in the draft when
> discussing IP handovers and Mobile IP.
>
> Alex
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> its mailing list
> its@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>
>


-- 
Michelle Wetterwald
michelle.wetterwald@gmail.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email