[ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 dynamic change of MAC addresses refs

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 10 February 2017 10:08 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26152129483 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 02:08:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.017
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.017 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r3VwBlC1LBFH for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 02:08:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 431AD1293D6 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 02:08:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id v1AA87GK013211 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:08:07 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E30A20C4B5 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:08:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CE020299A for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:08:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v1AA86Ld005013 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:08:07 +0100
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
To: "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>
References: <148052970170.9607.12043916621198119260.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Organization: CEA
Message-ID: <ec59bf70-252c-4009-5329-10e0135dd4aa@cea.fr>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:07:38 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <148052970170.9607.12043916621198119260.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms020906070709060500050509"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/9Q1dbPJeco4PMzOn6TJiIrjAaC8>
Subject: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 dynamic change of MAC addresses refs
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:08:11 -0000

draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00
dynamic change of MAC addresses refs

Hello IPWAVErs,

We received a comment about the text describing the need for dynamically
changing the MAC addresses for privacy reasons.

The old text being commented is the following:
> o	In vehicular communications using 802.11p links, there are strong
> privacy concerns with respect to addressing.  While the 802.11p
> standard does not specify anything in particular with respect to MAC
> addresses, in these settings there exists a strong need for dynamic
> change of these addresses (as opposed to the non-vehicular settings -
> real wall protection - where fixed MAC addresses do not currently
> pose some privacy risks).  This is further described in section
> Section 8.

The new next is:
> [same] and in function addressed in IEEE 1609.3, clause 5.5.1 and
> IEEE 1609.4, clause 6.7.

Alex