IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 RSU term

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 10 February 2017 10:34 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF08129542 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 02:34:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.017
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.017 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6tTKZOIxH-FO for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 02:34:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E49EC12955D for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 02:34:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id v1AAYgL7020277 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:34:42 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F65620C565 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:34:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851AF20C535 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:34:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v1AAYgGD026338 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:34:42 +0100
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
To: "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>
References: <148052970170.9607.12043916621198119260.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Organization: CEA
Message-ID: <d3cdd725-160f-b3cc-540b-00bbcec797c7@cea.fr>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:34:13 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <148052970170.9607.12043916621198119260.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms080909060608090100040101"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/aJUFW5Zd3PSLfJWRi0UuA482oPw>
Subject: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 RSU term
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:34:47 -0000

draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00
RSU term

Hello IPWAVErs,

We received multiple comments about the RSU term.  The strongest issue
is that apparently there are conflicts between our assumption of RSU to
be a router and FHWA(?) thinking RSU is more like an interface to a
router, or something like a master-RSU controlling (slave?) RSUs.
Unless FHWA tells us they agree RSU is a router, I will modify the
following:

Old:
> 2.  Terminology
[...]
> RSU: Road Side Unit.

New:
> RSR: Road Side Router; an IP router equipped with, or connected to,
> at least one interface that is 802.11 and that is an interface that
> operates in OCB mode.

and substitute RSR for RSU throughout.

This old 'RSU' term, now RSR, is absolutely needed in the draft when
discussing IP handovers and Mobile IP.

Alex

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email