Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 802.21 for IP handovers

José Santa Lozano <josesanta@um.es> Mon, 13 February 2017 08:51 UTC

Return-Path: <josesanta@um.es>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A57812950C for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:51:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rNVICx6bcVLG for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:51:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xenon22.um.es (xenon22.um.es [155.54.212.162]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C1E12944C for <its@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:51:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xenon22.um.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744DDF02; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:51:39 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by antispam in UMU at xenon22.um.es
Received: from xenon22.um.es ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xenon22.um.es [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id gJ05PpuXW6+d; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:51:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from falamo-236-250.inf.um.es (falamo-236-250.inf.um.es [155.54.236.250]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: josesanta) by xenon22.um.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0DA581F8; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:51:38 +0100 (CET)
From: José Santa Lozano <josesanta@um.es>
Message-Id: <9557CC88-9D66-459D-AEDA-D1AB5D5BF4B6@um.es>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_868EC54F-6BBF-460A-B574-54A5EC27B9F7"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:51:38 +0100
In-Reply-To: <e14a985e-ae65-cc59-c431-47fed128c3a8@cea.fr>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
References: <148052970170.9607.12043916621198119260.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <e14a985e-ae65-cc59-c431-47fed128c3a8@cea.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/76rJ1YRPSME0H7fVsg_dTuHqvJ4>
Cc: its@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 802.21 for IP handovers
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:51:45 -0000

Dear Alex,

Thanks for considering the comment.

Nevertheless, we also use RA in our solution in order to detect an 802.11p access router. The usage of 802.21 is an additional source of information to speed-up the selection of the most convenient point of attachment or communication flow to use. Due to this, let me propose a text that could be placed at the end of the former version of that paragraph:

"Additionally, IEEE 802.21 can be used to improve the network selection process, since it provides standardized mechanisms to monitor parameters of the local transceiver (e.g. the RSSI sensed from a RSU) and the reception of external information from an infrastructure node about the surrounding networks (e.g. area coverage or monetary cost)"

Just a suggestion.

Jose.



> El 12 feb 2017, a las 19:05, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> escribió:
> 
> draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00
> 802.21 for IP handovers
> 
> Hello IPWAVErs,
> 
> José Santa Lozano commented that their implementation can rely on 802.21
> (instead of WSA-with-WRA-field or RA) to realize IP handovers in 802.11-OCB.
> 
> The old text is this:
>> One such message may be the 802.11p’s Time Advertisement, or higher
>> layer messages such as the "Basic Safety Message" (in the US) or the
>> "Cooperative Awareness Message " (in the EU), that are usually sent
>> several times per second. Another alternative replacement for the
>> IPv6 Router Advertisement may be the message ’WAVE Routing
>> Advertisement’ (WRA), which is part of the WAVE Service
>> Advertisement and which may contain optionally the transmitter
>> location; this message is described in section 8.2.5 of
>> [ieeep1609.3-D9-2010].
> 
> New, if at all:
>> One such message may be the 802.11p’s Time Advertisement, or higher
>> layer messages such as the "Basic Safety Message" (in the US) or the
>> "Cooperative Awareness Message " (in the EU), that are usually sent
>> several times per second. Another alternative replacement for the
>> IPv6 Router Advertisement may be the message ’WAVE Routing
>> Advertisement’ (WRA), which is part of the WAVE Service Advertisement
>> and which may contain optionally the transmitter location; this
>> message is described in section 8.2.5 of [ieeep1609.3-D9-2010].  Yet
>> another alternative replacement for IPv6 RA is the involvement of
>> 802.21 signal levels, or additional 802.21 entities,
> 
> Alex
> 
> _______________________________________________
> its mailing list
> its@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its