Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 IEEE IPv6 vs. IETF IPv6

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 01 February 2017 12:53 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE34129D9F for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 04:53:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.195
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.195 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iIbtGQ8mjScZ for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 04:53:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1927129DA4 for <its@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 04:53:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id v11Cr9Q4005742 for <its@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:53:09 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D6E020489C for <its@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:53:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22745202D2B for <its@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:53:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v11Cr83G021669 for <its@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:53:09 +0100
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
To: its@ietf.org
References: <148052970170.9607.12043916621198119260.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <c5e320a9-6c3d-17bc-bbee-1994ffd3f7a4@gmail.com> <51c7f6d4-a998-bc91-1b01-3b9f06fb61fc@fischer-tech.eu>
Organization: CEA
Message-ID: <0803a267-6656-63e3-8d36-3c74b9c52a61@cea.fr>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 13:52:50 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <51c7f6d4-a998-bc91-1b01-3b9f06fb61fc@fischer-tech.eu>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms010305030002030000040402"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/FE1vE3vqAZVC2JccCS3eSxT4obE>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 IEEE IPv6 vs. IETF IPv6
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 12:53:12 -0000

Hi IPWAVErs,

There was a question:
> There is already a standard providing this capability today [IPv6
> over 802.11-OCB] – IEEE 1609 series. This service is already in used
> today (i.e.; obtaining Security certificates).  Question: are the
> “IETF-IPv6” and “IEEE IPv6” services mutually exclusive or must they
>  coexist in a same system (OBU or RSU)?  If the latter, there may be
>  technical conflicts to be solved.

Asked that way, IMHO and with all due respect, there can not be such a
thing as an "IEEE IPv6" functionality.  There is only one IPv6 (luckily)
and that is defined at IETF.

I agree though that some demos featured certificate obtention on IPv6 on
802.11-OCB.  I heard it multiple times.

If there was any conflict, we should tell them.

We can understand the technical issues if we look at the packet dumps of
these demos, and compare to other packet dumps of IPv6-over-802.11-OCB.
  Could you provide packet dump of obtaining certificates on IPv6 on
802.11-OCB according to IEEE 1609 spec?

Alex