IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 IP channel prohibition by 1609 (and not by .11)

Michelle Wetterwald <mlwetterwald@gmail.com> Fri, 03 February 2017 13:56 UTC

Return-Path: <mlwetterwald@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114B81293DA for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 05:56:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gXS8SEyqUNui for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 05:55:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x234.google.com (mail-yw0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AA27129D14 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 05:55:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x234.google.com with SMTP id l19so11724731ywc.2 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 05:55:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WF27EvwOrfrlbeW4O5L1/6Rrfe7CaX0UwOCzxhjWNWk=; b=AG8ean0Mt5yiZ9TfQX0boQgnX8Pb1rhZFogik4+z0pq2Ck2Nq3LUpNC1f17z5Zx9jc QdqRUKDlzzJ0UZwwNGxBhNP0Lx97wK6Uu8qOP27cIkyVUPVb05faNgVswLoA2pDLT+jT 9gVYQ7JB4G5SN0pGZsJRvxBTGJb4IS46sBGosTF0BHUCXt8DV71BWsugqdiovHjsUOp1 yyKqF8HFAKtkY9OYFt2q2TUKN3qVrWKUFHWaaXxlhJL/yH3Fs3nZwWFGXiyu9d/Lueil Chn3UOPhwOLmFSS1yRT6zfiYBmha75oIEcNi1uSIqjQi2Y5+lVCOJCEg3nkwT1Ot++FC /7AQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WF27EvwOrfrlbeW4O5L1/6Rrfe7CaX0UwOCzxhjWNWk=; b=cjywu5yBH5LzQxfvy+m2XDf0i0FodTZK5E4TlppjznLU8I3OIKZs0tuSuM1F/1dTKP GfYdvg3U0f+kgYTRrcI5vXa/HSdAKKy2vBI6EuOxkzJolfe0ASiwmq9/5mRGxpnaA4ms hp7klTiM/BE7CT2uVUnYoy1GTwqxlQ66VABwX3OloP9iySWsp1/ccYMUb5cFM+sz7ygh nfqrH3C3jQaccTESXFF6QBO1YSW55vQnCY2rmpJHZlVlQIC5IOxz7Fnmm9uLvQt9Yy14 636+piwdi9eUY6dvMgHK32F/+6HVLnsR2uqN00qrz3Ovf/NQ1NCdAZqo9pC2nqReuYY5 YuAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXK8QGnBcoQWTWLvbdZZPxuVVIgGkaCJ2IUR3ff7PMfPV3uUzMTNocmeTYykcl0Wr0+sfv0SzXW2N0GkfQ==
X-Received: by 10.129.77.65 with SMTP id a62mr11253845ywb.58.1486130158771; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 05:55:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.59.82 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 05:55:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0ba01e6b-5e61-a9ae-35c5-4be300d147fd@cea.fr>
References: <148052970170.9607.12043916621198119260.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0ba01e6b-5e61-a9ae-35c5-4be300d147fd@cea.fr>
From: Michelle Wetterwald <mlwetterwald@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 14:55:58 +0100
Message-ID: <CAF5de8tiP0qw3gCVJbn0j3o9Tj6c4_mujg7_R-dMU=1Z2d-U_w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140b7da346fb50547a0a4fd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/BM3RI2Myt6G5H8SbzvFGpgZPNRk>
Cc: "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 IP channel prohibition by 1609 (and not by .11)
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:56:01 -0000

Hi Alex,
You may also want to consider what is the objective of this future rfc.
IEEE 1609, as well as ETSI TC ITS standards, introduce (mandatory)
guidelines on using the 802.11-OCB. These cannot be ignored, or you are
drafting a specification that may not be usable in the field.
I would suggest to keep these considerations in an annex at least.

Best, Michelle

2017-02-03 14:41 GMT+01:00 Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
:

> draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00
> IP channel prohibition by 1609 (and not by .11)
>
> Hello IPWAVErs,
>
> A comment was made suggesting that the 802.11-OCB standard does not
> prohibit IP on any channel and, if there is such prohibition, it is
> certainly mandated by 1609 documents instead.  It was also commented
> that this prohibition is out of the scope of this Internet Draft.
>
> As such, I suggest to remove the following old text:
>
>> o       Explicit prohibition of IPv6 on some channels relevant for the PHY
>> of IEEE 802.11p, as opposed to IPv6 not being prohibited on any
>> channel on which 802.11a/b/g/n runs; for example, IPv6 is
>> prohibited on the 'Control Channel' (number 178 at FCC/IEEE, and
>> 180 at ETSI); for a detailed analysis of IEEE and ETSI prohibition
>> of IP in particular channels see Appendix B.
>>
>
> Alex
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> its mailing list
> its@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>
>


-- 
Michelle Wetterwald
michelle.wetterwald@gmail.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email