Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 figure comparing .11 to .11-OCB
Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 02 February 2017 17:40 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8581298AC for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 09:40:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.351
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.351 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.981, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vFDjAV-GCeJu for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 09:40:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D34821298C4 for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 09:40:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id v12HeBPl029898; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:40:11 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 4724820A227; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:40:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CDA20A04C; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:40:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [132.166.84.79] ([132.166.84.79]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v12Hdw6m021618; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:39:58 +0100
To: dickroy@alum.mit.edu, 'Nabil BENAMAR' <benamar73@gmail.com>, 'Jérôme Härri' <jerome.haerri@eurecom.fr>
References: <148052970170.9607.12043916621198119260.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <c5e320a9-6c3d-17bc-bbee-1994ffd3f7a4@gmail.com> <51c7f6d4-a998-bc91-1b01-3b9f06fb61fc@fischer-tech.eu> <006301d27c7c$8efefc30$acfcf490$@eurecom.fr> <4D5E38CB-828C-4E66-A671-C43893A0A884@gmail.com> <E78DA975CFA444F1AD58EE13BB3C2B85@SRA6>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <cc138c46-76f6-ae29-ab84-2f5e8b73026b@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 18:39:38 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E78DA975CFA444F1AD58EE13BB3C2B85@SRA6>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------AA31AD4CF4C00BBE926D055E"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/sthRStflNbQRhk2b6bvbmzkVcNg>
Cc: "'Dr. Hans-Joachim Fischer'" <HJFischer@fischer-tech.eu>, its@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 figure comparing .11 to .11-OCB
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 17:40:21 -0000
Le 01/02/2017 à 21:03, Dick Roy a écrit : > > To reiterate, when using an 802.11 MAC & PHY in OCB mode, there is NO > > 1)Synchronization, > What do you mean by No Synchronisation? BEcause a packet dump from a commercial RSU features a "IEEE 802.11 Acknowledgement"? Is this forbidden? Alex > 2)Authentication, or > > 3)Association > > performed at the MAC sublayer or lower. There are NO beacons or > probes allowed in OCB mode. That said, any chart showing the > difference between OCB and non-OCB mode must be independent of any > higher layer service being executed using either (lower layer) mode > and as such, addition of such irrelevant information would only be > confusing. OCB mode is very simple: > > STA1 STA2 > > |←---- data --→| > > where data can be data, action, or mgmt frames from a restricted set > (e.g. no beacons or probes). > > RR > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:*Nabil BENAMAR [mailto:benamar73@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 1, 2017 7:53 AM > *To:* Jérôme Härri > *Cc:* Dr. Hans-Joachim Fischer; Alexandre Petrescu; its@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 figure > comparing .11 to .11-OCB > > Hi Alex, Jerome, All > > *//* > > I agree with Jerome to illustrate the SLAAC in the process of IPv6 > configuration. > > It will show that there is no difference with other networks in the IP > layer. > > > > > Best Regards, > Nabil > >> On Feb 1, 2017, at 11:15 AM, Jérôme Härri <jerome.haerri@eurecom.fr >> <mailto:jerome.haerri@eurecom.fr>> wrote: >> >> Hello Alex, All >> >> I agree with Hans-Joachim, no beacon in OCB mode..and in general, we >> do not need to show ‘beacons’ in the chart, as even the association >> process does not ‘need’ a beacon…it just depends on if you do >> ‘active’ or ‘passive’ scanning. >> >> So, if you want to avoid any misunderstanding, you can also simply >> remove beacons from the drawing and mention ‘active scanning’…if you >> want to keep it, then if you use a beacon, then you do not need the >> probes (and mention ‘passive’ scanning)..directly association (to the >> best of my knowledge..) >> >> As for the data chart, it is also unclear..I would also tend to say >> that it could be easier to have bi-directional arrows for ‘data’ in >> both cases. >> >> Another point: this document is about IPv6..I would therefore suggest >> maybe to add the IPv6 processes (so that we have IPv6 data). So, you >> could add the SLAAC charts and maybe even Router >> Solicitation/advertisement charts. What do you think? These would be >> common between WLAN and OCB…we could then just visually show that we >> bypass some ‘lower layer’ phases, but IP remains similar. This could >> also help us with the statement that IPv6 needs to guarantee the >> security process that OCB is not doing…with such chart, that could help. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Jérôme >> >> *From:*its [mailto:its-bounces@ietf.org]*On Behalf Of*Dr. >> Hans-Joachim Fischer >> *Sent:*Wednesday 01 February 2017 11:58 >> *To:*its@ietf.org <mailto:its@ietf.org> >> *Subject:*Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 figure >> comparing .11 to .11-OCB >> >> * Beacons are not known in OCB mode >> * Data goes bi-directional >> >> Hans-Joachim Fischer >> >> Am 01.02.2017 um 11:44 schrieb Alexandre Petrescu: >> >>> draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 figure comparing .11 to .11-OCB >>> >>> Hello IPWAVErs, >>> >>> I suggested to illustrate the differences between .11 and .11-OCB by >>> means of a figure, and a co-author produced it. Unless there is >>> opposition I will include it in the draft. >>> >>> STA AP STA AP >>> | | | | >>> |<------ Beacon -------| |<------ Beacon -------| >>> | | | | >>> |---- Probe Req. ----->| |------- Data -------->| >>> |<--- Probe Res. ------| |------- Data -------->| >>> | | |------- Data -------->| >>> |---- Auth Req. ------>| |------- Data -------->| >>> |<--- Auth Res. -------| |------- Data -------->| >>> | | |------- Data -------->| >>> |---- Asso Req. ------>| |------- Data -------->| >>> |<--- Asso Res. -------| |------- Data -------->| >>> | | |------- Data -------->| >>> |------- Data -------->| |------- Data -------->| >>> |------- Data -------->| |------- Data -------->| >>> >>> (a) Traditional IEEE 802.11 (b) IEEE 802.11 OCB mode >>> >>> >>> Yours, >>> >>> Alex >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> its mailing list >>> its@ietf.org <mailto:its@ietf.org> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Hans-Joachim Fischer >> Managing Director >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Seminars on Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems >> http://fischer-tech.eu/Feeds/CITSseminars.html >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> + + + Instaurare omnia in Christo + + + >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> The information contained in this message is confidential and may be >> legally >> privileged. This email is intended for the addressee(s). Addressees >> may be >> individual persons or members of mailing list. >> If you are not an addressee, you are hereby notified that any use, >> dissemination, or reproduction of this email and its optional >> attachements is >> strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, >> please >> contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the >> original >> message. >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> ESF GmbH >> Fichtenweg 9 >> 89143 Blaubeuren >> +49 (7344) 175340 (Direct line) >> +49 (7344) 919188 (Central office) >> +49 (7344) 919123 (Fax) >> http://fischer-tech.eu <http://fischer-tech.eu/> : Main web of ESF GmbH >> http://its-standards.eu <http://its-standards.eu/> : News on >> cooperative ITS standardization >> http://its-testing.org <http://its-testing.org/> : International >> consultancy for cooperative ITS >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> ESF online-news: http://fischer-tech.eu/Feeds/esf.rss >> C-ITS online news: http://its-standards.info/Feeds/cits.rss >> ESF Online Nachrichten: http://fischer-tech.de/Feeds/esfD.rss >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> its mailing list >> its@ietf.org <mailto:its@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its >>
- [its] I-D Action: draft-petrescu-ipv6-over-80211p… internet-drafts
- Re: [its] I-D Action: draft-petrescu-ipv6-over-80… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [its] I-D Action: draft-petrescu-ipv6-over-80… Russ Housley
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Nabil BENAMAR
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Dr. Hans-Joachim Fischer
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Jérôme Härri
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Jérôme Härri
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Dr. Hans-Joachim Fischer
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Dr. Hans-Joachim Fischer
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… François Simon
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Nabil BENAMAR
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… John Kenney
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Jerome Haerri
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Jerome Haerri
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Jérôme Härri
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Jérôme Härri
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Russ Housley
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… John Kenney
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Jérôme Härri
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… François Simon
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… William Whyte
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Jérôme Härri
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Michelle Wetterwald
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Jérôme Härri
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… François Simon
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Rex Buddenberg
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Michelle Wetterwald
- [ipwave] ITS RDE and packet dumps Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Nabil Benamar
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Jérôme Härri
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Jérôme Härri
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Jérôme Härri
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Jérôme Härri
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Tony Li
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… William Whyte
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… William Whyte
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… John Kenney
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Rex Buddenberg
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… François Simon
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… William Whyte
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Jérôme Härri
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Jérôme Härri
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… William Whyte
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Rex Buddenberg
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… John Kenney
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Dr. Hans-Joachim Fischer
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Dr. Hans-Joachim Fischer
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… José Santa Lozano
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Jérôme Härri
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… José Santa Lozano
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Jérôme Härri
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… François Simon
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Jérôme Härri
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Dr. Hans-Joachim Fischer
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… François Simon
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Jérôme Härri
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… François Simon
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… José Santa Lozano
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Michelle Wetterwald
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… José Santa Lozano
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… François Simon
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb… Alexandre Petrescu