[ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 IP channel prohibition by 1609 (and not by .11)

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 03 February 2017 13:42 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22232129CE7 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 05:42:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.215
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.215 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WtSUZzHxjjRz for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 05:42:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48FCD129CE6 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 05:42:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id v13Dg7wd010133 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:42:07 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 2990B205ECB for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:42:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EFC9202969 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:42:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v13Dg6Y7008314 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:42:07 +0100
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
To: "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>
References: <148052970170.9607.12043916621198119260.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Organization: CEA
Message-ID: <0ba01e6b-5e61-a9ae-35c5-4be300d147fd@cea.fr>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 14:41:45 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <148052970170.9607.12043916621198119260.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms090802090503000305000708"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/tT7UB5CVA3xeK8qN9dmMlxpYgZ8>
Subject: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 IP channel prohibition by 1609 (and not by .11)
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:42:11 -0000

draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00
IP channel prohibition by 1609 (and not by .11)

Hello IPWAVErs,

A comment was made suggesting that the 802.11-OCB standard does not
prohibit IP on any channel and, if there is such prohibition, it is
certainly mandated by 1609 documents instead.  It was also commented
that this prohibition is out of the scope of this Internet Draft.

As such, I suggest to remove the following old text:
> o	Explicit prohibition of IPv6 on some channels relevant for the PHY
> of IEEE 802.11p, as opposed to IPv6 not being prohibited on any
> channel on which 802.11a/b/g/n runs; for example, IPv6 is
> prohibited on the 'Control Channel' (number 178 at FCC/IEEE, and
> 180 at ETSI); for a detailed analysis of IEEE and ETSI prohibition
> of IP in particular channels see Appendix B.

Alex