[ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 second guessing FCC

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 10 February 2017 10:59 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B07F129494 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 02:59:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tCYXl1O_XDGy for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 02:59:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6992B1270B4 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 02:59:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id v1AAxj9Y001632 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:59:45 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E6DE20C592 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:59:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BA620C4BF for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:59:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v1AAxjfc011621 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:59:45 +0100
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
To: "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>
References: <148052970170.9607.12043916621198119260.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Organization: CEA
Message-ID: <166684fc-cc17-b281-4e00-7cc018a1d465@cea.fr>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:59:16 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <148052970170.9607.12043916621198119260.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms000208060205070507060402"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/nlAhVAmO7I4ZpUa9aw_6a8UyIEs>
Subject: [ipwave] draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00 second guessing FCC
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:59:49 -0000

draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-00
second guessing FCC

Hello IPWAVErs,

There was a comment clarifying the interpretation of FCC-related text,
and advising against and undesirable but otherwise relatively common
practice of 'second guessing' the Commision's oppinion by implementers.

As such, I will remove the following text:

old:
> o  The FCC created two more terms for particular channels
> fcc-cc-172-184], among others.  The channel 172 (5855MHz to 5865MHz))
> is designated "exclusively for [V2V] safety communications for
> accident avoidance and mitigation, and safety of life and property
> applications", and the channel 184 (5915MHz to 5925MHz) is designated
> "exclusively for high-power, longer- distance communications to be
> used for public-safety applications involving safety of life and
> property, including road-intersection collision mitigation".
> However, they are not named "control" channels, and the document does
> not mention any particular restriction on the use of IP on either of
> these channels.

Alex