IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-yourtchenko-ra-dhcpv6-comparison-00.txt (fwd)

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Mon, 13 January 2014 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0E01AE062 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:42:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4xzz3QdvL9kq for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:42:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10B61AE061 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:42:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Files: signature.asc : 496
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah8FAKum01KQ/khM/2dsb2JhbABagwu6doELFnSCJQEBAQMBdwIFCwsOOFcGJ4doCKoxmhcXjwcHgySBEwEDkDOZeYFvgT87
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.95,651,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="3548836"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Jan 2014 08:42:42 +0000
Received: from dhcp-lys01-vla250-10-147-113-220.cisco.com (dhcp-lys01-vla250-10-147-113-220.cisco.com [10.147.113.220]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0D8geZM030042 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Jan 2014 08:42:41 GMT
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B2E88736-8F62-4E01-9C6B-74D5B945C430"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAEmG1=pfg74Xz8MbdRSpMaBJ8P1doHje=01ekBmL1U8_JR9P-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:42:41 +0100
Message-Id: <8BD83F50-65CF-4017-9786-171DB7561319@employees.org>
References: <CAEmG1=rRYwJaZp3qYF47=263jFp+BLpF3H6PuS8+Fd6qinMT3g@mail.gmail.com> <71B4A0D3-B4F2-4B3C-B38E-ED7678BEA6FE@nominum.com> <CAEmG1=pfg74Xz8MbdRSpMaBJ8P1doHje=01ekBmL1U8_JR9P-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-yourtchenko-ra-dhcpv6-comparison-00.txt (fwd)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 08:42:55 -0000

> I realize this setup isn't typical; but it's there, and I find it
> odd that the reaction from the community seems to be
> "people should stop trying to stretch the lifespan of
> IPv4 and just move to IPv6" at the same time saying
> "you should stop doing things the v4 way, and change
> your mindset and topology to match the v6 way".

the problem you are trying to solve is load-balancing among multiple first-hop routers on the link, right?
RFC4311 doesn't do what you want?
(assuming it was implemented).

cheers,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email