Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-yourtchenko-ra-dhcpv6-comparison-00.txt (fwd)

Andrew Yourtchenko <ayourtch@cisco.com> Wed, 04 December 2013 09:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ayourtch@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8EC1AE1D3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:52:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iYoJWxdiNVfA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:52:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609BC1AE0B9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:52:40 -0800 (PST)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from stew-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rB49qaot027404 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:52:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.61.202.200] ([10.61.202.200]) by stew-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rB49qXLt009520; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:52:33 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 10:52:36 +0100
From: Andrew Yourtchenko <ayourtch@cisco.com>
X-X-Sender: ayourtch@ayourtch-mac
To: "Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D821E26@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1312041048470.35140@ayourtch-mac>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1311271353550.3903@ayourtch-mac> <CAC8QAceTP5omdjS2_43AVKH8Jrb867scmKeb4_sS9YfwqQVTUw@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D821E26@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (OSX 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-895937014-1386150757=:35140"
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-yourtchenko-ra-dhcpv6-comparison-00.txt (fwd)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 09:52:42 -0000

Hi Bing,

On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Liubing (Leo) wrote:

> 
> Hi, Behcet
>
> 
> 
> 1. There is another draft, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem
> 
> what is the relation between these two drafts?
> 
> [Bing] As a co-author of the above mentioned draft, I think the scope of the two drafts is different.
> 
> Draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem focuses on address configuration, while Andrew’s draft makes a more general comparison between ND and DHCPv6.
> 
> As we know, there always be argument of things should be done through RA Options or DHCPv6 options, so I think this draft is aiming to provide some guidance on this general issue.
> 
> (Andrew, please correct me if I misunderstand your draft.)

I think yours is maybe an even laconic description than I've just sent in 
the other mail. Thank you!

I've marked this down as an 
"issue" on github https://github.com/ayourtch/ra-dhcpv6/issues/3 , 
it's maybe a good thing to discuss the relationship between the two.

--a

>
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Bing
>
> 
> 
> 
>