IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-yourtchenko-ra-dhcpv6-comparison-00.txt (fwd)

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 19 December 2013 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0EF1ADBCE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:21:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bsy4lMtypCMq for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:21:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og107.obsmtp.com (exprod7og107.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.167]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11EF91ACC8A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:21:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob107.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUrMA5ipjF7oIGJUEWp8QdFKyqOuha9u0@postini.com; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:21:26 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0851B82EA for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:21:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8A8190043; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:21:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:21:26 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr3qfZqFp-FuStvOz9uqidPU0TEMuC=O-VvZZVEXAo9bUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:21:24 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <09D891E7-4305-4627-B52C-CD5D4522FD7E@nominum.com>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1311271353550.3903@ayourtch-mac> <1386274786.29351.YahooMailNeo@web142501.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1312060759220.68814@ayourtch-mac> <1386378082.99914.YahooMailNeo@web161901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1312072028290.68814@ayourtch-mac> <F024FF5B-35A6-4221-952C-4A730A68C59D@delong.com> <D437C864-F276-46A6-A51E-4C57E5CF829E@cisco.com> <52B22828.6080700@inex.ie> <CAKD1Yr3TA9+yDpCRHNMOXNiq0bZ0x-yn=kVotiFD2187GjdnWw@mail.gmail.com> <52B2ED1E.1040108@inex.ie> <CAKD1Yr2hQBB_gsv6=zRLq6SmxF6JG=o2DT=-iDykSz7u=yJVZg@mail.gmail.com> <273B4FE5-E311-4327-8B04-13467AF9D72F@nominum.com> <CAKD1Yr3aeHu=4wy8NcRvT_bX9OdCE5PZ-JqJGZrxgVsi+uOK4w@mail.gmail.com> <6F8010C6-D8A3-49F9-AEA2-67527DCC02E3@nominum.com> <CAKD1Yr3qfZqFp-FuStvOz9uqidPU0TEMuC=O-VvZZVEXAo9bUQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-yourtchenko-ra-dhcpv6-comparison-00.txt (fwd)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:21:29 -0000

On Dec 19, 2013, at 9:10 AM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
> In homenet, what needs to be solved that can't be solved with fast NUD timers and RAs from multiple routers. You don't need subsecond convergence in the home, right?

If a neighbor goes down, there's up to roughly a 30-second delay before failing over to the other router.   That's pretty slow—not slow enough to kill a TCP connection, but slow enough that I will already have assumed my video stream has failed.

Also, we aren't talking about "in the home" in Nick's case.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email