IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Enterprises won't deploy IPv6 for IPv6's sake (as they didn't IPv4, IPX, XNS, or DECNet)

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 09 January 2014 10:11 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C6F1AE226 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 02:11:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.916
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.916 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eUWuLk-9SAcO for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 02:11:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x232.google.com (mail-ig0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36ED61AE228 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 02:11:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f178.google.com with SMTP id ut6so7144334igb.5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 02:10:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=gCM2S7/71Avpm4KzEUj1ac6sF9POCmMtzkAzopxO5DE=; b=NnaIPG7/hqOQdlutqs6qzfVqPx+tTYSAxhYqbP6p6V9TgGPBBgck3azCWZObHJjtk8 cAN3Befem2hmSaHTVM5/TNPZYsCohHwiZ2tzf7TQp1ixZ+kaS+iZib2nOy2cu5ukU0Fe /mP20lLv3WqzTUcKz/706r+lzmRR36bI3z6ErI1w/j5w1h49TgeODiZMVsIxD6h6sQnB NyQn36Kj0hR6Tkx56eWcN8kN4Zc9yYg89IZg2Ame8XW/cwS3K2iHcTPiyBz6StOSHlMH VErJUAdActzhP8eLUEqj+1PgMLguQbhz1ymkZ9Hy7XGarxTZur62Iw7keSC7/VXNxAQ5 X3UQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=gCM2S7/71Avpm4KzEUj1ac6sF9POCmMtzkAzopxO5DE=; b=OltyYbE6kUgMKMe9nfJe1w531uxAbTU0N+LoXnQgMmgyThVzaGgcoHN9fLtBKtWmG8 1o3bTY8jtlDNKHzAFPgrSxHspiVNlh7IOqBa5WeWgOukOBfWv9Y4n0XLgOhN0xGFibsg Yia872qT+OF6asYt4oRxbuj829p99yJSl0l6VTeHRo8Ak1vYL0/HY1DrrBcl5VtOOpq2 houyrMw6IlDlkhE12VCn34OJyvuw/wkpit68OrOKzYhqlVuzWFhI82iF4nCoi5y5liRx fou8YSesRecOHdR2fvLMMtHEWtUJC/WH8f29111NxCDRi12O7Hxt/vARmgTHw2qtb4Ni zdiw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnDl9Gzs6mCDqbeLBVD2MhcD4AdMbL8mvHjLBRv7ZBSX8YkdNBfYc/kZ6weSHSc5i12cYt+lMs9Z3+GB6Goo1PiooC9Bq3lVqzJNySh6soebPFSmsUwRGWPlAZQmUz0fSRTNuLdkRWbA4Qcyl+FWPjS5rdM0E1l2ZL8URjTTZKZWaCqZNIyUl3N3rNeyd/MtZEiiVFB
X-Received: by 10.50.176.137 with SMTP id ci9mr37518537igc.31.1389262250727; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 02:10:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.7.36 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 02:10:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1389261993.72423.YahooMailNeo@web161906.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
References: <1386274786.29351.YahooMailNeo@web142501.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1312060759220.68814@ayourtch-mac> <1386378082.99914.YahooMailNeo@web161901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1312072028290.68814@ayourtch-mac> <F024FF5B-35A6-4221-952C-4A730A68C59D@delong.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1312080643090.68814@ayourtch-mac> <B561C767-677A-4A37-BA69-EB24951B2817@delong.com> <52A4C6FD.1080504@gmail.com> <98CACA9B-AD61-460A-93AC-D5EEA1176706@delong.com> <CAEmG1=qLxqWdB8JR4rbAS-TyqQtPcGnZvVb7DSBCrmFcrm0vUA@mail.gmail.com> <20140107104001.GM81676@Space.Net> <m2lhyqb354.wl%randy@psg.com> <72626BC4-CB9E-49E8-8A54-48A141F52C0C@nominum.com> <m2k3eab1op.wl%randy@psg.com> <6A64F619-4A0E-423A-A5E7-4C3234B461AE@nominum.com> <m2fvoyb0hd.wl%randy@psg.com> <1389261993.72423.YahooMailNeo@web161906.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 19:10:30 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr32FsX7LVuA6_eiGYX2Kcdh7Vb0VE=q0-rvH_ZZ3MBhLg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark ZZZ Smith <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0111e0daf4806504ef86d2ac"
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Enterprises won't deploy IPv6 for IPv6's sake (as they didn't IPv4, IPX, XNS, or DECNet)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 10:11:01 -0000

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Mark ZZZ Smith <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au>wrote:

> Change IPv6 as much as people want, but if it isn't possible to identify
> how it, or the applications that exclusively run over it will save or make
> them money, enterprises will ignore it. More change and more options to it
> will only increase it's deployment costs, further increasing the barrier it
> has to jump before it saves or makes an enterprise money.
>

Hear, hear.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email