IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> Fri, 16 December 2016 02:27 UTC

Return-Path: <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E5612952D; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:27:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4IMRkRqeg1nT; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:27:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x243.google.com (mail-qk0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5E341294AB; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:27:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x243.google.com with SMTP id t184so1189065qkd.1; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:27:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=wpy6R8Ko2mPVdkHy05ZeqjjqIcdH8eOg84g0TjbSE+c=; b=Uw378nX8MzxEqe7dTFVXRhCLWtPxKtz4VYz3rqwl406LsTk8ImZEcPUFbYZhDMLaMe JnuAhNoQ7b4QPwbyy6puATQavVeH4DbvuI4iwLQ9e3BXXPNDSXQzsXc7NieP75I3sJz7 NQB0YFtXTnX69LNvXF9oHyhrYBwRSwhKZJJxurq+ze7CsMxiF6OpM7Yj/FOCxuzZuuhq 1Ikz1S2ZlKmLS3a+pjfOEROrlgS5IsHMsY4LyiCvgQJ7+W4wUQkewqcZeZ13fClgdBf7 t6eGBPUxQ7oFpDaB2p0B/IM8y5sICZPBvN94BQRXiyx+3hUW+JLGAnd0CyWjRLrp0UTl CYKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=wpy6R8Ko2mPVdkHy05ZeqjjqIcdH8eOg84g0TjbSE+c=; b=UTcf8YiF3rIbuo1Va2fhnR5O5vp645JZDjRRVDbkTHWq61DN1dEnfGroTT3spl9b8y xI4s7JYiYvx2DXUpgUTqyHeih7M4D6so4QhbHvnd0PwY8Zav8TeWCllofEd1cpu4Wkpl tukzRBUE0/JenaQJFJdD4W7OsBzmqxL+khLCn6mtyXINBLSDBnbWIDP6rdoF82NCVXP+ EuU9oiysrjH6wP+xgupnEI9UNuMuz/n1C4IESshO72pmc0zIuKN4hyvcQiDPdQSpGxL0 DeO4I8MRhYVCmSBGi8VFulnRCDb8NEXnvaGuCp6DhdeotReprd6OmVmoqQa4ANiLD1aO PgNw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLTN3AcbyXXjxhnmPUHDTZ1tWGgUw1xHYWbQJSftpM1jlEw3lnXleD35z9eeEgTFA==
X-Received: by 10.55.76.150 with SMTP id z144mr560282qka.194.1481855252854; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:27:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:181:c381:c20:75e6:3815:2871:5df5? ([2601:181:c381:c20:75e6:3815:2871:5df5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i19sm2666860qte.8.2016.12.15.18.27.31 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:27:32 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B0C588EF-E1F9-4BE2-BD26-9F16AC91D4E2"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <DA8A78A5-419E-44CD-B930-B6A74B3B9DCC@fugue.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 21:27:29 -0500
Message-Id: <D2B31B04-0E1A-40D3-91E3-86752B321865@gmail.com>
References: <4ab2a538-603e-4e7a-3be9-ad75ed459006@bellis.me.uk> <B192A1B3-03FF-43D1-AD30-12BBA2D65DF0@gmail.com> <9fe0e34d-51e9-bdf3-a650-d8b3681f1cd8@bellis.me.uk> <CAPt1N1=Z2xERw68-=iFGgYYnEO3eDW-8tvhmTmaf4+vU-24grQ@mail.gmail.com> <C059877D829F76429F49E0B48705D888F7FD2C7B@EXCH-01.CORP.CIRA.CA> <4A870505-070B-4065-B360-5A98485E4CEB@fugue.com> <313759CF-B72F-401D-BA26-79C214C30686@shinkuro.com> <8D7E8E5C-EC8E-46E9-9C07-947D7A7F69E3@fugue.com> <20161215204024.50DE55CF0320@rock.dv.isc.org> <DA8A78A5-419E-44CD-B930-B6A74B3B9DCC@fugue.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/9mI1W3urzRMtxV1oN1vUUEkoLD0>
Cc: Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com>, HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>, Jacques Latour <jacques.latour@cira.ca>, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 02:27:36 -0000

> On Dec 15, 2016, at 3:51 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> 
> On Dec 15, 2016, at 3:40 PM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org <mailto:marka@isc.org>> wrote:
>> The IETF and ICANN are going to need to address this issue.  It
>> does no one any good to leave it festering.
> 
> Yup.   I think that’s the bottom line.

ICYMI….

DNSOP has been considering exactly this set of issues for some time, and has adopted two relevant drafts:

* Problem statement for special use domain names: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/>

* Proposal for new top-level special use domain name as “TLD” for other special use domains: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/>

Update to the roadmap from the chairs soon, but we’re looking towards consensus on the problem statement and proposals for updates/refinements to the registry policy set out in RFC 6761.

Comments/reviews on these drafts to DNSOP are welcome. 


Suzanne 
(for the chairs)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email