IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Wed, 14 December 2016 21:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4379C129983 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:51:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99pFRNn5ZdPI for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:51:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hydrogen.portfast.net (hydrogen.portfast.net [188.246.200.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42778129A76 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:51:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [46.227.151.81] (port=59835 helo=rays-mbp.local) by hydrogen.portfast.net ([188.246.200.2]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1cHHS6-0006oZ-FZ (Exim 4.72) (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Wed, 14 Dec 2016 21:51:06 +0000
To: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>
References: <4ab2a538-603e-4e7a-3be9-ad75ed459006@bellis.me.uk> <E773C5B4-BA00-488C-9854-C729B671DFBD@gmail.com> <95E95A61-2079-498B-91C6-E98B50B84044@shinkuro.com> <CAPt1N1nCWgEtsMY4s669CHicWppyz9wCVYA9HR0QR_rGOPXSfA@mail.gmail.com> <CE36578B-780B-4222-B5A8-F6A252259234@shinkuro.com> <CAPt1N1n+PcuJ+AU-6U4TFiJvjNWz1PRNNp+y=zbnMSxZVKZ57A@mail.gmail.com> <201612142014.uBEKE0KA022671@bela.nlnetlabs.nl> <2b2d2cd1-9f88-ec81-14bd-e87c033cca8d@bellis.me.uk> <201612142133.uBELXmOU091057@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <d504b4cc-3815-6efa-d826-d1f6e68ad863@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 21:51:11 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201612142133.uBELXmOU091057@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/gHXMFVz3lMHLcvbgT4gmqqeBP5I>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 21:51:43 -0000


On 14/12/2016 21:33, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote:
>  Ray Bellis writes:
> 
>  > On 14/12/2016 20:14, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote:
>  > > Any reason why homenet shuld use a TLD? What is wrong with something
>  > > like homenet.arpa (or thuisnet.arpa, or bob.arpa).
>  > 
>  > <hat partly-on>
> 
> Which hat?

Sorry - Homenet WG co-chair :)

> But is there a technical argument? Or is this just a well a believe
> it doesn't fit perfectly. Does it really matter how the identifier
> is called?

No technical arguments, AFAICR, but user-friendliness and acceptance are
desirable criteria.

I should note that this has already been discussed ad-nauseum on the
Homenet WG list and in WG sessions.  The WG consensus was to apply via
RFC 6761 process for ".homenet", but then the insecure delegation point
was raised.

Ray

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email