IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [homenet] Fwd: WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 15 December 2016 02:36 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305BD12955F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 18:36:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kvtvkBnZ0noe for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 18:36:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D1EE129469 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 18:36:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id f82so24069824wmf.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 18:36:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=W2iuQ9gD13aw6QwGERLOyN+BgDTt69o7Aj+JZdSUOcI=; b=H+Jx0uIcN8XhASwyCo1dVVupkJXGPGbgsW4p+xaBFF9LlyL30D2MxJu1BQloaFJiAA dIQeyReVJStrmHgn63tMovVyWmbcBL+yqtcR64+sNMaoSEbEywbrTlLEGbJ7mflL/jID J/hVlHiyD7J0sFGNlP9wOqgyzZIUDYa9w61uabJUCUnLy1sOQe1pg9EmAT3M+kfe4tIp cf88Og8hvfRN6ohbNKHmFHP/iY9YcS9nurVu+XprTreQSNadayHOlRdeOwVHsDn812O4 KSTA+1kB3iY1ePtPDbIQ6NMlI6B9vFCh5BMdQBYvv9eDf2ykIhXyATm6ugaBWWWvYVEq WOiw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=W2iuQ9gD13aw6QwGERLOyN+BgDTt69o7Aj+JZdSUOcI=; b=Mbh+TPvYxTae7BWX064payZEcddH5YBJm9bZqPw1gurVsX2oVfhXZzPxxg9IBbGFyV CphoRZRi+XAeD58x+66ZMrxGv9YxNVXerr+auSB4y3Fr4QocGzj34PYZMbtiLd6n1btW CU70uPMAaUB6NdgSW+GH7glhmcecl/V1FDuBS6O9IcfmB3XnSPt7/SOO1FMvBlGRxiyj yBd35jKHda7TuP0JOc7go1NIdbewGp5RNpNxrrpqRnoga13pc34pXqMs0aANUEW1E8Bg sVTILl0G6brOCdKhInbRYywKLPOkeLFfiC/ICP5Z6GyFBksNnNZjiDgUpqV2JBNQ8pnL 45cw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00lRo/QXRuVi0w13kekKxh8kViExlvWkMcjoJhSxqp/nMiwbZ++/4slUeDQdADR+GrprW+Azuw5fDS45A==
X-Received: by 10.46.7.9 with SMTP id 9mr38267304ljh.75.1481769382651; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 18:36:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.165.8 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 18:35:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612142023170.4133@ary.qy>
References: <20161214220428.1688.qmail@ary.lan> <9EC2695D-5CC5-479F-9998-27810608E71E@fugue.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612141948330.4133@ary.qy> <CAPt1N1mRh9kk_dc21eBTVx0iJaY6G2f_3cMxLP7WSvGGhc+Frw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612142023170.4133@ary.qy>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 21:35:41 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1=nT0ApwvtJHKaqWkNs_QcdH+T6Xvuo+pSw-S8mU0G1-A@mail.gmail.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045ec30ab13b390543a951a4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ZijTZGZTStta0oI7_uPf4zO90do>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [homenet] Fwd: WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 02:36:26 -0000

You would need a special resolver to _validate_ .homenet automatically
using a trust anchor published by the home network.   You do not need a
special resolver to look up names in the homenet without validation, if
there is an unsecured delegation at the root.   If there is a secure denial
of existence or a secure delegation at the root, then no validating
resolver can look up names in the homenet domain.

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 8:24 PM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, Ted Lemon wrote:
>
>> That is precisely why we need an unsecured delegation.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Except that as the [etc] said, it doesn't really solve the problem.
>>>
>>
> It solves the problem of not repudiating names in the homenet.   You have
>> to have a special resolver to be able to validate them.
>>
>
> I'm confused -- if you need a special resolver to handle .homenet anyway,
> why does it matter what's in the root?
>
> R's,
> John
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email