IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] reducing the crap going to the root

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Sun, 18 December 2016 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA821294DA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 07:52:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B5yAl-kf_Gbl for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 07:52:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (shaun.rfc1035.com [93.186.33.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AECA71293DA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 07:52:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EA55242125C; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 15:52:45 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <0B8372E7-D332-48B4-AD8A-CA4C2FEA2A5E@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 15:52:45 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AC7A417C-02B8-4F4B-8B1B-7FDCD5129706@rfc1035.com>
References: <20161214220428.1688.qmail@ary.lan> <9EC2695D-5CC5-479F-9998-27810608E71E@fugue.com> <CAH1iCioPZiO78j478BV7t=pTN9LZXQbweeBZQF2w3O1gKwx3XA@mail.gmail.com> <20161215011803.A2B705CE7CAA@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAH1iCir6R=DG+RM1BoMn1s31x3ZoN4bHLO7dWdVL-yCD3u3R0A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=Mw=LSQ+dwFX2MFKTzSHMzWKAMLrW9fQPaAggMb+GJ-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCirFZtCWVkMqFp8Fb=wJLzmBNb2k5PfxKBRNUtgVR7cMXA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1nHmrRwAGGJCTwD=PhW1w=QHHSnvi1D3GN4kNxHSgapEA@mail.gmail.com> <20161215041912.32A8F5CE9152@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAPt1N1mwoGDuc8fn7mFd0R3cx_xQLBM3H=ye9L+ceE6kvUo-mQ@mail.gmail.com> <4195DBA6-6EAE-45CE-AD61-9236C62124D0@google.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612151555520.6844@ary.local> <CAPt1N1mWLw-thMrVvztdSDkPp6zW8ptick4ZnDKUatBf44QfiA@mail.gmail.com> <49A7DCF7-9FEC-4572-BE88-D90B415F330A@virtualized.org> <BE8D68C9-3E7D-459C-AA9B-855B43A53CC5@fl1ger.de> <FB447501-FC7D-4484-9DE2-BC7A59EEBFEB@rfc1035.com> <0B8372E7-D332-48B4-AD8A-CA4C2FEA2A5E@gmail.com>
To: Burkov Dmitry <dvburk@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zxjZUPvVVQura3J-b_iAZ6E4hhE>
Cc: IETF dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] reducing the crap going to the root
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 15:52:48 -0000

> On 18 Dec 2016, at 15:46, Burkov Dmitry <dvburk@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Jim,
> but you raise for me another question - if 90% will be served by google,etc - what the real value and role of the roots?

Dima, that’s a question to be answered by people well above our pay grade and we shouldn’t go down that particular rat-hole on this list.

That said, I doubt google get 90% of the Internet's query traffic. But that’s just detail. Whatever the actual number is, it will be substantial.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email