IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [homenet] Fwd: WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 15 December 2016 21:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7ED8129445 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 13:01:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id icbPUuswqXDh for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 13:01:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E044D129446 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 13:01:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id f82so3945899wmf.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 13:01:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UU3eBm1G4H/DfhWZUi1xSyoWzx1gPxCUMZ/LdskuVAA=; b=GBYfHm35h8X5yfZbyao316o7TzRXatr2SGObpga/c/mgtDbeXL6n4ed7/f8uAU0XLa rjAKz/AKoL+ODhkbbrjzjZXMklG3tXQUS38nYnd+P2swD71BjDSlmSQ+RqnQ7EFUpmfB pYHu6zsk2uY3ZJ9NnphjJoNE15awYUpdh8KIfNZ6X4ZIxLkoB93p2Bblo4q7HWA/1shY CreCc6UnenmqxQN+1kjwfVSqJpznvWJrI18sanlrNTxB2hvU+m2wExjiE9rrBqmoy1Us w7VAguM+7utX4vI8PHIH0kaMzQdeVfCW0YwuRyGS2oZJRUEoPQeSBjSX4p2rM5qUf2bx 7CmQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UU3eBm1G4H/DfhWZUi1xSyoWzx1gPxCUMZ/LdskuVAA=; b=JEHNbWU4986p1QQuGfSFZ1zLvRJ+9I4aoeCi0DDUEgn6lMsdKToDuuGIn2S96zxKOc bKnkJUkb3xp1zzGqAGMBHsmfFdcRoH5UTZiYaWws7u/SWQxdx3odPIBxCsSEnsqDpLU0 APbZ63SDyd6z92muPdJjQfDZMLzwJM/CNqWffmagm4QhEdI7ChTzvtTkMA8hqM0G0hiZ P8iFySnTdOhS0f9otmIXwWeHgCWo2mI/6LKbk78e9l+uOpwYzslzicON/nqbLgsI5HP4 jVNozPEhxf2ih30hsRFWg3FltwVe1xrOyysL2thZKn2oj+DevKv46Jjp8XH+5z4FaOTH +sxw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01MnB3D1XTCAi2xY+MULPI9wBKgeXa1BtuRUzsxsUTqaXz+9XBd1B0BfGindIFSI+lIzce6hPVzJvY9qQ==
X-Received: by 10.25.190.79 with SMTP id o76mr1094959lff.56.1481835661341; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 13:01:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.165.8 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 13:00:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612151555520.6844@ary.local>
References: <20161214220428.1688.qmail@ary.lan> <9EC2695D-5CC5-479F-9998-27810608E71E@fugue.com> <CAH1iCioPZiO78j478BV7t=pTN9LZXQbweeBZQF2w3O1gKwx3XA@mail.gmail.com> <20161215011803.A2B705CE7CAA@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAH1iCir6R=DG+RM1BoMn1s31x3ZoN4bHLO7dWdVL-yCD3u3R0A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=Mw=LSQ+dwFX2MFKTzSHMzWKAMLrW9fQPaAggMb+GJ-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCirFZtCWVkMqFp8Fb=wJLzmBNb2k5PfxKBRNUtgVR7cMXA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1nHmrRwAGGJCTwD=PhW1w=QHHSnvi1D3GN4kNxHSgapEA@mail.gmail.com> <20161215041912.32A8F5CE9152@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAPt1N1mwoGDuc8fn7mFd0R3cx_xQLBM3H=ye9L+ceE6kvUo-mQ@mail.gmail.com> <4195DBA6-6EAE-45CE-AD61-9236C62124D0@google.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612151555520.6844@ary.local>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 16:00:20 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1mWLw-thMrVvztdSDkPp6zW8ptick4ZnDKUatBf44QfiA@mail.gmail.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1a1b7e35c9450543b8c021"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/p2LK18WAutnxcr5B--N5-slGe60>
Cc: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [homenet] Fwd: WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 21:01:06 -0000

Billions and billions of them?   How often do they query the root, do you
think, compared to a stub resolver that did recursion itself?

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:57 PM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> Putting an iterative resolver in a stub resolver is an attack on the DNS
>>> infrastructure.
>>>
>>
> Ted might want to alert all of the BSD and linux distros that default to
> running a copy of bind or unbound answering queries on 127.0.0.1.
>
> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email