IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] [DNSOP] iterative vs. forwarder, was Fwd: WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 15 December 2016 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5072129452 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 13:11:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=n9HvMEIy; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=CLgecds8
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ttnb2AhagXCI for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 13:11:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFB06129438 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 13:11:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 99228 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2016 21:11:43 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=1839b.5853070f.k1612; bh=j7KJMpKbxHn/RCABVLweenHQSpEtdZ3EqJn7sSzc6Lk=; b=n9HvMEIyfgg8DgWMjToxXyJEC0F7rXwvuJfbfmwPQTGed2xSpKdXhTf7zU+QF5JLoITF/ynD/owqj+HLD2HF8ntFq9KsGDMT5yaN5chtiZSU/t4FGUbGmxgyuPJ1MVyIEk/7KGV0MXkGWqI7zzGIO0ouujB+j78/FbOwIEPhpoKxyFZOkJoD3/pFep8LvTX5RFLTwlW2rVfW1HA+Ql+zTOSbLR/yRWh6B5IJ+iCmKR/8ejSFIcFpA1uAnPmyEjCJ
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=1839b.5853070f.k1612; bh=j7KJMpKbxHn/RCABVLweenHQSpEtdZ3EqJn7sSzc6Lk=; b=CLgecds8io71+bViiJ+yvZS1h8OwXvkFkQXE2LP4F8el9GS6hl5IJLSyA60cjAc5+gyaZQQ/AM8MrdFkGeC9Ii9HKQ+CjzHjAAV+OUm6E85CJbrWFrVD8OCWS0PPQ861RO/ABe5tdsm+iWJY/VUGXHzwqjFNgji4G19igqbMSVIROmsV/+l4am2cydUVlqeY4mi21W+wdpyuoRxjco+9jsuTq35dCRoW5o7UHxTLDybFcMLGL+0ERe7TJL5sKedk
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 15 Dec 2016 21:11:43 -0000
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 16:11:37 -0500
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612151606300.6844@ary.local>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1mWLw-thMrVvztdSDkPp6zW8ptick4ZnDKUatBf44QfiA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20161214220428.1688.qmail@ary.lan> <9EC2695D-5CC5-479F-9998-27810608E71E@fugue.com> <CAH1iCioPZiO78j478BV7t=pTN9LZXQbweeBZQF2w3O1gKwx3XA@mail.gmail.com> <20161215011803.A2B705CE7CAA@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAH1iCir6R=DG+RM1BoMn1s31x3ZoN4bHLO7dWdVL-yCD3u3R0A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=Mw=LSQ+dwFX2MFKTzSHMzWKAMLrW9fQPaAggMb+GJ-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCirFZtCWVkMqFp8Fb=wJLzmBNb2k5PfxKBRNUtgVR7cMXA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1nHmrRwAGGJCTwD=PhW1w=QHHSnvi1D3GN4kNxHSgapEA@mail.gmail.com> <20161215041912.32A8F5CE9152@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAPt1N1mwoGDuc8fn7mFd0R3cx_xQLBM3H=ye9L+ceE6kvUo-mQ@mail.gmail.com> <4195DBA6-6EAE-45CE-AD61-9236C62124D0@google.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612151555520.6844@ary.local> <CAPt1N1mWLw-thMrVvztdSDkPp6zW8ptick4ZnDKUatBf44QfiA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/rnp0ejHxBU5Gi-TGn9fMnuVvAME>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] [DNSOP] iterative vs. forwarder, was Fwd: WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 21:11:41 -0000

On Thu, 15 Dec 2016, Ted Lemon wrote:
> Billions and billions of them?   How often do they query the root, do you
> think, compared to a stub resolver that did recursion itself?

I have no idea, although I do know that IoT devices tend to use stripped 
down linux distros.

In any event, given that most of the root traffic is junk, I wouldn't 
think that any plausible increase in non-junk traffic would be noticable. 
Queries for TLDs cache really well.  You might want to talk to the RSSAC.

R's,
John


>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:57 PM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>
>> Putting an iterative resolver in a stub resolver is an attack on the DNS
>>>> infrastructure.
>>>>
>>>
>> Ted might want to alert all of the BSD and linux distros that default to
>> running a copy of bind or unbound answering queries on 127.0.0.1.
>>
>> Regards,
>> John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
>> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> homenet mailing list
>> homenet@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>>
>

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email