IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] [DNSOP] Fwd: WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Thu, 15 December 2016 04:19 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620D412984A; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 20:19:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VYJz5NMHQrYn; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 20:19:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [199.6.1.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D11F1294C8; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 20:19:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FAFC1FCAE6; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 04:19:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE5BA16000F; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 04:19:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAEC16006E; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 04:19:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id avQJifSSf0R9; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 04:19:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c27-253-115-14.carlnfd2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [27.253.115.14]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A583216000F; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 04:19:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A8F5CE9152; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:19:12 +1100 (EST)
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <20161214220428.1688.qmail@ary.lan> <9EC2695D-5CC5-479F-9998-27810608E71E@fugue.com> <CAH1iCioPZiO78j478BV7t=pTN9LZXQbweeBZQF2w3O1gKwx3XA@mail.gmail.com> <20161215011803.A2B705CE7CAA@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAH1iCir6R=DG+RM1BoMn1s31x3ZoN4bHLO7dWdVL-yCD3u3R0A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=Mw=LSQ+dwFX2MFKTzSHMzWKAMLrW9fQPaAggMb+GJ-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCirFZtCWVkMqFp8Fb=wJLzmBNb2k5PfxKBRNUtgVR7cMXA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1nHmrRwAGGJCTwD=PhW1w=QHHSnvi1D3GN4kNxHSgapEA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 14 Dec 2016 23:01:26 -0500." <CAPt1N1nHmrRwAGGJCTwD=PhW1w=QHHSnvi1D3GN4kNxHSgapEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:19:12 +1100
Message-Id: <20161215041912.32A8F5CE9152@rock.dv.isc.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/-Azf5aDwTfG3EsTgxK9TXVFgRAU>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>, Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
Subject: Re: [homenet] [DNSOP] Fwd: WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 04:19:27 -0000

In message <CAPt1N1nHmrRwAGGJCTwD=PhW1w=QHHSnvi1D3GN4kNxHSgapEA@mail.gmail.com>
, Ted Lemon writes:
> 
> A stub resolver is expected to query a caching resolver, not the root.   So
> all that is required for this to work is that the resolver advertised on
> the homenet claim authority for the zone, and that there be an unsecured
> delegation that validates that the homenet resolver can give to the stub
> resolver.   Stub resolvers that query the root themselves will fail.   This
> is a feature--that behavior is broken.

Why shouldn't a iterative resolver work if we can make it work?

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email