IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [homenet] Fwd: WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Sat, 17 December 2016 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9701D1296B8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 11:42:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=virtualized-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6mdo3bl8EaD6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 11:42:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x235.google.com (mail-pg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69DFE1293DC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 11:42:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x235.google.com with SMTP id f188so45007785pgc.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 11:42:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virtualized-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=awPkDB5K0yEUr26dfVu5kXaBUwK86W+YVThkO49Fnmo=; b=p3b+GY4vfDAng0/uRWrgS8vvENGZH1U6WHSfPdIgIs2Zt6nXS6QPEAs7a7mGltUu/6 Xw5lidDraRgnc/+jCOW1Tnx9WIcu/RpJ7/mjoVwZCnYfe3RSMMX4SF9IyMTZRfqlJ9zT Xa0uZ/p80NWN2iguNaQu4bk3s87S7yxgk2GUi1clI7HMq9P5Acu3qAFJV+ghPj2b2jer dnNH6r4leLqXD9u2iPMRjNsK7pk4htzPGitHVedOJgQjFF090L3pF8PVQDxQy00prLlr 3AUfoFil/3CC1TPvk17JMdqH7xB5LuvYFFzigybarhxr8GlgwrSyatyt32T6WKzsWlHF 5IcQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=awPkDB5K0yEUr26dfVu5kXaBUwK86W+YVThkO49Fnmo=; b=RDLF6oq2CZT+dcn1cncVV/c0L5jIW5HKikQk8qDU5rVjwnWiF/SauOtzZalB6vnu9Q AtLH44HD8TFFS2uPu8UrDJ8Ac6SBHqM8S2feVGuZ3ZvoBu/oDUb8Za/z/Em2ws9ALr6d LhvPy+Qae2I9iwDlzyw6ylw4vr90C6KZ7Qyr7YEzMWr4ccCcJ90mky0Wl24nefpSZPy9 d96pmpAMBOmMhVm1qUjDhFomqf43yQvFQCBX1c0psVJEkPFUsSpscTmo+gYVZdTXQGa/ LK/aazihNZcPOPulm+S4ITYrVd9PSWV52Fh7pKZBRSXbDrynR+YPrD2hPeQf6up4ST/A EjtQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03Vcp399abxWqdKsctoQXCKOvzH+AFr7FxtEyiIo/MqafJGq8vPCZjoawUKgpDf0Q==
X-Received: by 10.84.217.70 with SMTP id e6mr19724895plj.161.1482003729971; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 11:42:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4301:9590:11ff:e45c:8fc3:50b2? ([2601:647:4301:9590:11ff:e45c:8fc3:50b2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q14sm20657069pfa.40.2016.12.17.11.42.08 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Dec 2016 11:42:09 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C7BCA406-59F5-4AE9-8CFF-41B15C1661D3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACfw2hg8x7u=F0pu8BFr6HMKkvApGs5svKAUR8XVY+rcc2CMgA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 11:42:07 -0800
Message-Id: <3F7679D3-F96B-4DE3-8C2B-CE44E347E4AD@virtualized.org>
References: <20161214220428.1688.qmail@ary.lan> <9EC2695D-5CC5-479F-9998-27810608E71E@fugue.com> <CAH1iCioPZiO78j478BV7t=pTN9LZXQbweeBZQF2w3O1gKwx3XA@mail.gmail.com> <20161215011803.A2B705CE7CAA@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAH1iCir6R=DG+RM1BoMn1s31x3ZoN4bHLO7dWdVL-yCD3u3R0A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=Mw=LSQ+dwFX2MFKTzSHMzWKAMLrW9fQPaAggMb+GJ-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCirFZtCWVkMqFp8Fb=wJLzmBNb2k5PfxKBRNUtgVR7cMXA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1nHmrRwAGGJCTwD=PhW1w=QHHSnvi1D3GN4kNxHSgapEA@mail.gmail.com> <20161215041912.32A8F5CE9152@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAPt1N1mwoGDuc8fn7mFd0R3cx_xQLBM3H=ye9L+ceE6kvUo-mQ@mail.gmail.com> <4195DBA6-6EAE-45CE-AD61-9236C62124D0@google.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612151555520.6844@ary.local> <CAPt1N1mWLw-thMrVvztdSDkPp6zW8ptick4ZnDKUatBf44QfiA@mail.gmail.com> <49A7DCF7-9FEC-4572-BE88-D90B415F330A@virtualized.org> <CACfw2hg8x7u=F0pu8BFr6HMKkvApGs5svKAUR8XVY+rcc2CMgA@mail.gmail.com>
To: william manning <chinese.apricot@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/NitcnmuCCPvRxW3GBzm-cabr0bk>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [homenet] Fwd: WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 19:42:11 -0000

Bill,

On Dec 17, 2016, at 11:36 AM, william manning <chinese.apricot@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any public data to support the presumptions of excess capacity at the roots and the impact of NSEC aggressive use on the DNS?

Warren provided some interesting anecdotes at the last IEPG, but I'm unaware of any formal modeling.

> I know that in the previous century, punting on operational impact by guessing about outcomes was common.   I thought the IETF had moved away from SWAG and was working toward a more disciplined and fact based process for making changes.

I make no comment on what the IETF has moved towards or away from.

Regards,
-drc
(speaking only for myself)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email