IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 12 December 2016 20:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74B11294C7 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:03:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hHD0cNflBQ77 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:03:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1E411296A1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:03:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id u144so16648820wmu.1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:03:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4nNLgX5yryk2HXSKCLGUlMXx6aMZY3kL4MiNyuh9W54=; b=OfxrnVoeNB7myX1NmN9N045SIYy2bRviotyL/SNlpNKv7pQFE9dnxm+UCHgskLFrnv ZwF7WG0Uf1PtSE32qqkGNOmFtcyOPiLa6WiwbtIYuFxxLYMlpLNxq5vxjSP0vgxKX/mQ e2o0Jbeb/IJZP22sWGoXc4/OQDDYe0LJVE3wEyU78fHLX/UflCh4G41PRo2pSTnf5IkA bH1Zxpcju/BauFjf4d19Kep30IPzrHGz2vERtljmb3UYIDbSWL9qXENhD9Gz99iivW29 E5ciWFKTDLkzp7JgBDMs3A7dYguw0uYf4pXjGRfW86nR73Hs/LsbPwO8G7FtnLxf3+uY UyPw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4nNLgX5yryk2HXSKCLGUlMXx6aMZY3kL4MiNyuh9W54=; b=e2wbd2ECeWF9vA/NWKlqdIHmyJkw1S9VseJyiF1IERxL3gwjmc4h53yRQYJbgt64p0 7mlTLhLIW8oWder7sUH6+PrSVTqoxIXG+5btUx+z9dp4SE0mHUCw04bHk9tnDWlU3l7Z xLwiIlcp5Ybljm8X+j8diLbG9wLzkMHfpBl0nDrbW8BCKHsOPi1QBa96M5w4gz/OiiC5 tjtrj5EnmA8r0dV88OJDajN8zq4LzYpPlzT6XlNC3Dh1Gi47hh3LzeRw+oz5EBdvz3Zl YDLZJ54tKIlMcyueOpjZj89IJQQrZ4LN/D+18TvNOts1RNkKw9mONz88vsJQwXM0XVYg yuLA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC012AlW53bfxiwfYCdzlm4ztwyd6gkw1R6WHhxO8sq8SQuD1xXWiNr4wSpHzoa/wTQvojmP8txzyba5hsA==
X-Received: by 10.25.192.20 with SMTP id q20mr31518720lff.5.1481573023069; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:03:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.165.8 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:03:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.165.8 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:03:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <585D7369-28A8-4B6D-BE77-C94B42CA4432@google.com>
References: <4ab2a538-603e-4e7a-3be9-ad75ed459006@bellis.me.uk> <B192A1B3-03FF-43D1-AD30-12BBA2D65DF0@gmail.com> <9fe0e34d-51e9-bdf3-a650-d8b3681f1cd8@bellis.me.uk> <CAPt1N1=Z2xERw68-=iFGgYYnEO3eDW-8tvhmTmaf4+vU-24grQ@mail.gmail.com> <585D7369-28A8-4B6D-BE77-C94B42CA4432@google.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:03:42 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1mHoCq0QpKaAc_gJNYa-aoLu4FwtgTEpOXwhHFt8_Udaw@mail.gmail.com>
To: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045e56eebfd36b05437b99da"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/J00l2DHkUjnJDqbRRzNagu0as58>
Cc: HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 20:03:47 -0000

That is a separate discussion. We can't standardize on a process that
doesn't yet exist.

On Dec 12, 2016 1:59 PM, "james woodyatt" <jhw@google.com> wrote:

> On Dec 12, 2016, at 07:46, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
>
>
> I'm not in love with this as an end solution, but it has the advantage
> that the IAB controls .arpa, and so we can get an unsecure delegation right
> away assuming the IAB agrees.   I see no reason to think they would not.
> It's a bit more typing, and there is the problem that the fourth google
> result for arpa is "Advanced Research Projects Agency.   But it would work,
> and quickly, and would keep the whole process in the family.
>
>
> A third available option is to obtain a new “regular” top-level domain for
> IAB to control that has a better name than “arpa.” and use that for the
> insecure delegation to the “home” subdomain.
>
>
> --james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email