Re: [homenet] [DNSOP] Fwd: WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 15 December 2016 01:24 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F6A129ECE for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:24:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=aIVo6Xw6; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=rJvjvE4t
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bkmxK56u0lGV for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:24:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 888C61295FA for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:24:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 82134 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2016 01:24:46 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=140d5.5851f0de.k1612; bh=GhtqhT+wSekftQoR9OaT0Rl8dEnGKEYS8RAJ6K30Jz8=; b=aIVo6Xw6nhXzUK7frFA6kMJ6FBs4zySG/7eEjXFCA2USmZ5HunKvTqJVf+sjnvbzSPRZ4v6Hs4FqbmtzpqzcliEL8871Qfap49UsvjgjcuJEtpOco7J65ZfEF2w/NOvOItXzhgB8Y+60lq9uVbrPTvY1GVlPOoHcxtR2lAErNPTyj4ty9bdLUmVmYg1kPdN/TqmRWiUVExBsWJVvudmBdM06G+Tcr2YxLIQch3/igJTIerJn2xWuD4SJiVxDm32w
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=140d5.5851f0de.k1612; bh=GhtqhT+wSekftQoR9OaT0Rl8dEnGKEYS8RAJ6K30Jz8=; b=rJvjvE4tIlofnxEPDS+VbzuAembN/aCDthziq2CPlKO0G1pomMC1E4gihkBQr+86xy97yHUY7+F83BCj9ACJvpOLPMZ2WmVqMBb/tmRappDoXKcgUR2EGz/p+wmyn9F599tnL5ZtEE2/3fgc7k+YMMBPk1uXI0mXxI4wy6Ob65Osmn9zWRKw9ufvxFINwI7KKcjq3Q3wfmcPkgrQzM+ACAD3pZjAcIUzFSBTKVGv+86gXKHnzxzMkqVc+SBgckZi
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 15 Dec 2016 01:24:46 -0000
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 20:24:40 -0500
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612142023170.4133@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1mRh9kk_dc21eBTVx0iJaY6G2f_3cMxLP7WSvGGhc+Frw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20161214220428.1688.qmail@ary.lan> <9EC2695D-5CC5-479F-9998-27810608E71E@fugue.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612141948330.4133@ary.qy> <CAPt1N1mRh9kk_dc21eBTVx0iJaY6G2f_3cMxLP7WSvGGhc+Frw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/l0Vt7PCVzPa3jSEQEjR1wshvuY8>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, homenet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homenet] [DNSOP] Fwd: WGLC on "redact" and "homenet-dot"
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 01:24:45 -0000

On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, Ted Lemon wrote:
>>> That is precisely why we need an unsecured delegation.
>>
>> Except that as the [etc] said, it doesn't really solve the problem.

> It solves the problem of not repudiating names in the homenet.   You have
> to have a special resolver to be able to validate them.

I'm confused -- if you need a special resolver to handle .homenet anyway, 
why does it matter what's in the root?

R's,
John